Catholic News

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=291218&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Jan 13, 2026 / 17:58 pm (CNA).

Martha Patricia Molina, a Nicaraguan lawyer and Catholic researcher, urged the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) to "return your eyes to Nicaragua."

"In Nicaragua, praying in public is considered a crime," Molina said at a Jan. 13 hearing in Washington, D.C.

USCIRF heard testimony about freedom of religion or belief violations against Christians following the release of the 2025 USCIRF Annual Report. Witnesses recounted their experiences with religious freedom violations in Nicaragua, China, Nigeria, Algeria, Vietnam, Egypt, Burma, Eritrea, and Pakistan.

In Nicaragua, Molina said, "the measures that must be taken need to be more aggressive. Sanction the army. Impose direct economic sanctions. Bring [President] Daniel Ortega and [his wife, Vice President] Rosario Murillo and their collaborators before international justice and prosecute them for crimes against humanity. This year has proven that it is possible."

Molina has conducted a study, " Nicaragua: A Persecuted Church," to show "the horrors done" at the hands of the dictators. Molina said since April 2018 she has documented 19,836 attacks "perpetrated by the dictatorship of Daniel Ortega and Rosario Murillo in Nicaragua against priests, nuns, and laypeople."

"In Nicaragua, altar boys … are harassed and monitored by the national Nicaraguan police and forced to sign documents whose contents they do not understand. Their parents are harassed and threatened with imprisonment if they speak to the media," she said.

The Nicaraguan dictatorship "prohibits the entry of Bibles into Nicaragua and also controls the workshops where the images that Catholics use for veneration are made," she said.

Nicaraguan Catholics are as "afraid as when the disciples of Jesus were afraid after his killing," Molina said.

In Nicaragua, "the lack of religious freedom has profoundly limited the pastoral work of priests," she said. "They are literally forced to be careful about how to proceed when they preach for fear of being in prison or exiled."

Ortega and Murillo have "arbitrarily closed 13 universities and institutes," she said. "With hatred, they have shut down centers for young people who were studying to become priests, and 304 priests and nuns have been exiled from Nicaragua. They are being expelled or prevented from entering the country."

Due to the lack of priests now, "there are dioceses in Nicaragua that are surviving only with 30-40% of their priests," Molina said. "As a consequence, communities in the interior of Nicaragua see their religious practices limited. They can no longer go to confession regularly."

She added: "It is with urgency that we need to stop the criminals or they will continue to advance, which will eventually reach us in the United States."

U.S. leadership

"At a time when Christians abroad face attacks simply for their faith, U.S. leadership is critical now more than ever," Commission Chair Vicky Hartzler said during the Jan. 13 hearing.

Hartzler said in an interview after the hearing: "We want to have more countries designated as countries of particular concern, as special watch lists, that entity is of particular concern. We work tirelessly, constantly visiting with people on the ground, the countries hearing their stories."

"We are very thankful the president designated Nigeria as a country of particular concern and is starting to take action to help people there," she said. "But there are many other countries who are repressing their people, and we need to act on those countries as well. The United States has a tremendous amount of influence and opportunity to make a difference, and we should use our voice and our spot in the world to be able to help others."

The commission also heard from U.S. representatives and senators who shared their support for the mission of USCIRF and legislation to protect religious freedom in the U.S. and abroad.

"The United States is a Christian nation," said Rep. Riley Moore, R-West Virginia. "We have a unique duty to defend Christians wherever they are being persecuted, and I will never stop fighting for our persecuted brothers and sisters in Christ."

Rep. Mark Alford, R-Missouri, said China under Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party "does not hide its actions." He added: "Officials openly tell religious leaders that loyalty to the party is more important than loyalty to God Almighty." He touted legislation to reinforce China's designation as a country of particular concern.

Hartzler said: "Religious leaders and laypersons, including Jimmy Lai, faced furious charges of fraud and subversion. In recent years, the government has demolished churches and removed crosses from public view."

Grace Drexel testified about her father, Pastor Ezra Jin, who is imprisoned in China.

Jin "was arrested by the Chinese authorities, along with 27 other pastors and church leaders from Zion Church; 18 total remained imprisoned," she said. The October "crackdown represents the largest takedown of an independent Christian population in China since the Cultural Revolution."

"I urge this commission to recognize that what is happening in China is not merely a domestic matter but a global threat to religious freedom and human dignity," Drexel said. "If the international community remains silent, we signal acceptance and impunity for such traveling of universal human rights. And unfortunately, what happens in China does not stay in China."

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=291217&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Jan 13, 2026 / 18:45 pm (CNA).

The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday on whether to uphold state laws banning transgender athletes from competing on women's sports teams, and Catholic athletes outside the court said they hope justices keep the laws on the books.

Mary Pennefather, captain of the women's basketball team for Christendom College in Front Royal, Virginia, said: "If these court cases are allowed to happen, then say goodbye to all women's sports, because then all the transgender athletes will just come and play in the women's sports and get their national champion championships and NCAA titles from there."

Standing among her teammates outside the Supreme Court, Pennefather said: "I can work as hard as I can to be good at my sport, and a man can come in and work half as hard, and he will always be bigger, faster, and stronger than me. It totally goes against God's natural law. He made humans male and female. And now you have these people coming in here and saying, 'That's not right,' that men could be women and vice versa … it's totally disrupted and disordered, and it's a breakdown of the family."

The court heard more than three hours of arguments regarding two cases originating from Idaho and West Virginia in which lower courts upheld challenges by transgender athletes to statewide bans under the U.S. Constitution and federal anti-discrimination law. Supreme Court justices including Brett Kavanaugh, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch appeared to back the bans at several points during the oral arguments.

The challenges were brought by two transgender athletes: 15-year-old West Virginia high school student Becky Pepper-Jackson, and Boise State University student Lindsey Hecox of Idaho, who had attempted to withdraw the case but was ultimately denied.

Bishops weigh in

U.S. bishops submitted an amicus brief in support for the petitioners in Idaho v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J., stating that if Catholic schools were forced to allow transgender athletes in women's sports, they would need to halt all athletic programs or stop accepting funding "because allowing such competition would undermine fundamental Catholic teachings regarding the immutable, God-given differences between the sexes."

Idaho and West Virginia both have laws that ban transgender athletes from competing on sports teams at public schools and universities that do not correspond with their sex assigned at birth. There are 25 other states that have such laws.

"There are an awful lot of female athletes who are strongly opposed to participation by trans athletes in competitions with them," Alito said at one point during the oral arguments. He then asked whether girls who express these opinions should be regarded as "bigots." He added: "Are they deluded in thinking that they are subjected to unfair competition?" He also questioned whether transgender athletes hold an unfair advantage over biological women in sports at other points during the hearing.

Alito further insisted that a definition of sex is necessary in order to prove that transgender athletes are being discriminated against, stating: "How can a court determine whether there's discrimination on the basis of sex without knowing what sex means for equal protection purposes?" Alito posed this question in response to ACLU lawyers' position that a definition of sex is not legally necessary.

Kavanaugh emphasized the importance of Title IX and sex-based distinctions, stating: "One of the great successes in America over the last 50 years has been the growth of women and girls' sports. And it's inspiring."

He said allowing transgender people to compete in women's sports would "undermine or reverse that amazing success and create unfairness."

"For the individual girl who does not make the team or doesn't get on the stand for the medal or doesn't make all-league," he said, "there's a harm there, and I think we can't sweep that aside."

Gorsuch said "bottom line, sports are assigned by sex because sex is what matters in sports," adding that separation based on sex "is the fairest and the safest and the most administrable way to assign sports teams."

"It's been widely accepted for many decades because it's necessary for fair competition because, where sports are concerned, men and women are obviously not the same," he said during the hearing. "If Idaho can't enforce a sex-based line here in sports, where nobody disputes that biological differences matter, then no line based on biological sex can survive constitutional scrutiny."

"The court should uphold the Fairness in Women's Sports Act and reverse," he concluded.

Outside the court, Matt Sharp, senior counsel with Alliance Defending Freedom, highlighted the importance of the court "protecting fairness in women's sports."

"If young women are made spectators in their own sports," Sharp said, "we know they're going to lose medals, they're going to lose scholarships, they're going to have their privacy violated."

Steve Ward, a board-certified internal medicine physician with Do No Harm, said: "I think this issue is representative of a much deeper concern that I have about the medical profession," he said. "We're here to support women's sports, and that's certainly important, but to my mind, we really have to think more carefully about what this means for the future of science and scientific research."

Ward emphasized the importance of scientific research based on "objective and fixed" reality. "All of these great great scientists of the past understood that, that the world could be studied because they had a Judeo-Christian worldview understanding that we live in a world that you can approach and you can make objective observations, perform the scientific method and so forth and reach some type of a conclusion that you can repeat and move forward with, develop technologies and all sorts of things," he said, adding: "If we discard all of that history in favor of psychological categories, then you really can no longer do science at all, and you have to throw that away."

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=291212&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Jan 13, 2026 / 11:11 am (CNA).

The Order of Malta's Holy Family Hospital in Bethlehem is facing severe operational constraints and its mobile clinics remain unable to reach Bedouin villages in the West Bank due to movement restrictions and violence, the order's grand master told diplomats Jan. 10.

Fra' John Dunlap said in his annual address to the diplomatic corps that the 900-year-old Catholic order is committed to help reconstruction efforts in Gaza City led by Egypt, the Palestinian Authority, and other partners.

Middle East operations central

The ties to the Middle East are central to the order's mission, particularly in Lebanon and the Holy Land, Dunlap told the diplomatic corps accredited to the order at the Magistral Villa on Rome's Aventine Hill.

He expressed concern about restrictions on movement, violence, and persistent shortages of essential services in the West Bank, citing the operational challenges facing Holy Family Hospital and the inability of mobile clinics to reach Bedouin communities.

Latin America remains a region of paramount importance, Dunlap said, announcing a regional conference of the Order of Malta for the Americas in Buenos Aires in autumn 2026 to streamline regional humanitarian initiatives.

Africa continues to receive substantial investment through specialized programs of Ordre de Malte France and Malteser International, with newly established relations with Gambia and Burundi yielding rapid progress, he said.

Ukraine constituted a major focus, with Dunlap calling for hostilities to cease and full protection of civilians and civilian infrastructure. The order expressed readiness to support dialogue initiatives "in full respect of its principles of neutrality and impartiality."

UN status sought

The order aspires to attain "enhanced status" within the United Nations that more accurately reflects the nature and breadth of its worldwide activities, Dunlap concluded.

The order currently holds permanent observer status at the U.N. and maintains diplomatic relations with 115 countries.

Ambassador Antoine Zanga of Cameroon, dean of the diplomatic corps, praised the order's "humanitarian diplomacy" in his response speech and invited Dunlap to continue promoting "charity, solidarity, peace, and defense of international humanitarian law in a world where the rules are fading."

Dunlap described 2025 as a year of exceptional intensity, marked by the jubilee, the death of Pope Francis, and the election of Pope Leo XIV, which "profoundly resonated across both the life of the universal Church and the broader international community."

"The order is truly the institution of the Gospel, which it follows as Jesus taught it through his apostles," Bolivian Ambassador Teresa Susana Subieta Serrano shared with CNA after the speech of the grand master. She noted that the grand master mentioned Latin America as a region of paramount importance for the order.

"We recognize many good things that the order is doing. I am also the special envoy of my country to Africa, so I appreciate the particular mention of this continent. My intention is to do projects in Africa together with the order," Slovenian Ambassador Franc But told CNA.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=291211&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Jan 13, 2026 / 11:41 am (CNA).

Reacting to Bishop Michael Martin's Dec. 17, 2025, pastoral letter announcing the impending abolishment of altar rails and kneelers in the Diocese of Charlotte, North Carolina, 31 of the diocese's priests have signed a letter to the Vatican's Dicastery for Legislative Texts containing a set of questions, or "dubia," related to the matter.

According to The Pillar, which obtained a leaked copy of the diocesan priests' letter last week, the priests directly question "whether a diocesan bishop may prohibit the use of kneelers to assist members of the faithful who, of their own accord, wish to receive holy Communion kneeling."

In December, Martin issued a pastoral letter saying that by Jan. 16, the use of altar rails, kneelers, and "prie-dieus" (movable kneelers) will no longer be permitted in the diocese, and any "temporary or movable fixtures used for kneeling for the reception of Communion" must be removed.

In his pastoral letter, Martin said while an "individual member of the faithful" is free to kneel to receive and should not be denied Communion, the "normative posture for all the faithful in the United States is standing," per guidelines from the U.S. bishops.

"The faithful who feel compelled to kneel to receive the Eucharist as is their individual right should also prayerfully consider the blessing of communal witness that is realized when we share a common posture," he wrote.

In their letter to the Vatican, the diocesan priests specifically question the bishop's actions to impede the faithful from kneeling at built-in altar rails when that is the norm for a parish, a practice the bishop has insisted upon when he celebrates Mass at such churches in the diocese, according to Brian Williams, an advocate for Charlotte's Traditional Latin Mass community.

When Martin concelebrated a Mass with several other bishops last summer at a parish whose commmunicants usually kneel at an altar rail to receive, per the bishop's direction, according to Williams, Communion was distributed in front of the altar rail to discourage parishioners from kneeling.

"Since an altar rail is a common and traditional 'structure and ornamentation' that marks off the sanctuary from the body of the church within the Roman rite, it is asked whether a diocesan bishop has the legitimate authority to prohibit the erection of altar rails within churches or other sacred places in his diocese," the diocese's priests query in their letter, as reported by The Pillar.

A priest in the Charlotte Diocese who wished to remain anonymous due to an alleged "atmosphere of fear, retaliation, and mistrust" told CNA that the actual number of the dubia's supporters is "well north" of the 31, or a quarter of all priests in the diocese, who actually signed it.

"Certain priests have prudentially decided to withhold their signature," he told CNA.

According to a social media post by the Traditional Latin Mass community in Charlotte: "Several diocesan sources in Charlotte have confirmed that the actual support for the dubia is closer to 50% of priests, nearly double the number of signers."

In his December pastoral letter, Martin also specified norms for extraordinary ministers, prohibited the practice of intinction (when the consecrated bread is dipped into the wine before being placed on the tongue), and encouraged the reception of Communion under both kinds — the bread and the wine — which he says fell out of practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.

In May 2025, a draft of a letter detailing several other of Martin's intended reforms of traditional practices in the diocese was leaked. In that letter, the bishop said that because "there is no mention in the conciliar documents, the reform of the liturgy, or current liturgical documents concerning the use of altar rails or kneelers for the distribution of holy Communion, they are not to be employed in the Diocese of Charlotte."

The diocesan priests' Jan. 5 letter to the Vatican manifests that "both the leaked letter from this past summer and the pastoral letter of Dec. 17 have caused a great deal of concern amongst the priests and faithful of the Diocese of Charlotte, especially in those parishes that have allowed the faithful to use an altar rail or prie-dieu for the reception of holy Communion."

The diocesan priests' letter also addresses issues from Martin's leaked May letter in which the prelate suggested that certain liturgical practices and elements such as the use of Latin, ornately decorated vestments, certain prayers, and altar ornaments will be prohibited because they are not in accord with changes made after the Second Vatican Council.

Asked about the Jan. 5 letter containing the dubia, a spokesperson for the Diocese of Charlotte told CNA that the bishop "has not 'restricted kneeling.'"

In a Jan. 8 statement to CNA, Martin stated: "My brother priests are always welcome to ask questions and seek clarification about the application of liturgical norms. To be clear, the only modifications that have been made since the Diocese of Charlotte last updated its liturgical norms in 2011 involve the distribution of holy Communion, as spelled out in my letter to the faithful in December."

Apparently referring to the leaked May letter, Martin continued: "Questions arising from the internal and confidential conversations of the Presbyteral Council are premature and lack substance, since no definitive action has taken place outside of the December 2025 letter. The norms highlighted in the letter keep our diocese aligned with the broader norms of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and the universal Church."

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=291210&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Jan 13, 2026 / 12:11 pm (CNA).

Eighty years after the expulsion of ethnic Germans from Czechoslovakia, a Czech bishop has declared a local Year of Reconciliation to address wounds that remain from World War II and its aftermath.

Bishop Stanislav Pribyl of Litomerice announced the initiative in a pastoral letter dated Dec. 31, 2025, following the end of the Jubilee of Hope on Jan. 6. The year marks two anniversaries on Jan. 13: the 1866 healing of Magdalena Kade and the 1946 founding of Ackermann-Gemeinde, a Catholic reconciliation group established by expelled Germans.

"The end of World War II brought not just joy and relief but also reckoning with people and the past," Pribyl wrote in his letter. The war's aftermath caused displacement and resettlement of populations across Central Europe, leaving lasting scars on the region.

After Nazi Germany annexed the Sudetenland in 1938 and established the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, the majority-German region became part of the Reich. Following Germany's defeat, Czechoslovakia expelled approximately 3 million ethnic Germans between 1945 and 1946, primarily from the Sudetenland region that now forms part of the Diocese of Litomerice.

The bishop acknowledged that the question of whether the expulsions were justified remains a matter for historical debate. However, the displacement remains visible in demolished houses without owners and in churches that are abandoned or slowly being rebuilt.

Confronting collective guilt

The bishop emphasized that collective guilt, anger, and desire for revenge accompanied the displacement, along with "the sudden acquisition of property without work and closer ties to the place." Some departing Germans were robbed, raped, or humiliated, a few committed suicide, and there were several massacres, Pribyl wrote.

Following a meeting of the diocese's priests' council in November, Pribyl declared the local jubilee of forgiveness and reconciliation. Monthly gatherings will take place in locations where the deportation was particularly cruel, including Terezín (Theresienstadt), which hosted a Nazi transit camp during World War II.

The events will include Christian-Jewish prayer services and Masses of reconciliation. The bishop hopes for "an ecumenical and interfaith spirit" at these gatherings, welcoming Christians, Jews, and Heimatsleute — Germans with deep historical ties to the region.

The press office of the Diocese of Litomerice told CNA that the jubilee is local and invitations were not sent out broadly. "This is not politics or a revision of history, although historians partake in the preparation," the press office said.

Heinrich Rüdiger, military attaché from the German embassy to the Czech Republic, joined the first event at Filipov on Jan. 13 marking the anniversary of the healing miracle.

Ackermann-Gemeinde's reconciliation work

The Ackermann-Gemeinde was founded in Munich on Jan. 13, 1946 — the feast day of the Marian apparition at Filipov — by expelled Sudeten German Catholics who sought reconciliation with the Czech people despite their own suffering. The organization took its name from "Der Ackermann aus Böhmen" ("The Plowman from Bohemia"), a medieval German literary work from Bohemia symbolizing the deep cultural roots of Germans in the region.

The organization has worked for decades on cross-border partnerships, supporting the restoration of damaged churches and cemeteries in the Czech Republic and advocating for human rights. Since 1991, Ackermann-Gemeinde has maintained an office in Prague.

Filipov shrine

Filipov, a Marian sanctuary in northern Bohemia near the German border, is sometimes called "the Czech Lourdes." On Jan. 13, 1866, Magdalena Kade, bedridden with severe illnesses, received a vision of the Blessed Virgin Mary, who told her: "My daughter, now you are healed."

Kade immediately recovered, and Bishop Augustin Pavel Wahala of Litomerice initiated a commission that recognized the healing and its supernatural character. Between 1870 and 1885, a neo-Romanesque church was built at the site, which Pope Leo XIII elevated to a minor basilica and dedicated to Mary, Help of Christians.

The Redemptorist order took custody of the shrine in 1884 and continues to care for pilgrims. Pribyl is himself a Redemptorist.

Opening old wounds to heal

"You might think that we should stop this reconciliation, as it has been 80 years, it is like taking corpses out of graves," the bishop wrote in his letter. However, he argued that old wounds must be opened to be healed.

The reconciliation effort "may not be definitive, but an important step towards the healing process that our region still needs so much," the bishop said. He noted that in some places, reconciliation is only beginning.

"Although we did not do wrong to our neighbors 80 years ago, we still live from the life-giving movement of forgiveness, as we pray in the prayer that Our Lord Jesus Christ himself taught us: 'Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us,'" Pribyl wrote.

The bishop concluded: "Prejudices survive and the reluctance to talk about them or to admit that we have all sinned is still here."

The reconciliation initiative follows recent Czech-Polish-German efforts to address the war's legacy. In November 2025, Polish and German bishops signed a new declaration in Wroclaw marking the 60th anniversary of historic 1965 reconciliation letters.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=291209&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Jan 13, 2026 / 12:41 pm (CNA).

Angola is one of the countries Pope Leo XIV plans to visit in what will be his first pastoral trip to the continent of Africa as pontiff, the apostolic nuncio in the southern African nation has announced.

Addressing journalists during a press conference on Tuesday, Archbishop Kryspin Witold Dubiel confirmed that the Holy Father had accepted invitations from both the Catholic bishops of Angola and the country's President João Lourenço, adding that the timelines and itinerary of the visit and program are still being finalized.

"At this moment, we are preparing the plan and program for Pope Leo XIV's visit to Africa. We do not yet have details on the exact date or program, but these will be communicated as soon as they are defined," Dubiel said.

The native of Poland's Diocese of Przemysl invited all Angolan citizens to prepare for this significant event.

"I hope that the Holy Father's visit will be an opportunity to rediscover the values that have shaped the Angolan people and to share these values with the diverse communities that live and work around the world," said the Vatican diplomat in Angola, who also represents the Holy Father in São Tomé and Príncipe.

Also speaking at the press conference was the president of the Bishops' Conference of Angola and São Tomé and Príncipe, who called upon Angolans to participate in the committees that will be established to prepare for the papal visit.

"Each of these committees should give their best in the preparation, promotion, and realization of all tasks assigned," Archbishop José Manuel Imbamba of Angola's Saurimo Archdiocese said.

Imbamba thanked Pope Leo XIV for accepting the invitation to visit Angola.

Archbishop Filomeno do Nascimento Vieira Dias of Angola's Archdiocese of Luanda described the planned papal trip as a "moment of great human and spiritual comfort," occurring during a special period in the history of Christianity and in the year marking the "grand jubilee of Luanda — 450 years as a city, 450 years celebrating the faith."

Dias emphasized that the visit places Angola on the path of evangelization and universality.

He went on to thank the Angolan government for "opening the doors" and for accepting to collaborate with faith-based leaders to facilitate the papal visit.

In December 2025, Pope Leo XIV reportedly indicated that he would visit Africa in 2026, naming Algeria as a possible initial destination. Angola, Equatorial Guinea, and Cameroon were also mentioned as potential stops.

Pope Leo is the first pontiff in modern history with firsthand knowledge of Africa. Unlike his predecessors, he has already been to eastern, western, southern, northern, and central Africa in person.

As he began his papacy following his May 2025 election, the American-born member of the Order of St. Augustine had already visited Kenya at least half a dozen times, the regional vicar of the order in the east African nation told ACI Africa — the last visit to the country having taken place in December 2024.

In a May 12, 2025, interview, Father Robert Karanja Ireri, superior of the Order of St. Augustine in Kenya, recalled that Pope Leo XIV had visited the neighboring Tanzania, confirming the country's Daily News report that he had visited the East African nation multiple times.

Karanja also confirmed that Pope Leo XIV visited Algeria in North Africa.

Some members of the Augustinian Sisters of the Mercy of Jesus in South Africa recalled their interaction with Pope Leo XIV, then Father Robert Francis Prevost, when he visited the southern African nation.

According to the Nigeria Catholic Network's May 10 report, Pope Leo would not be "a stranger to Nigeria, as records show that he has visited the country on at least nine occasions between 2001 and 2016."

In his capacity as Augustinian prior general, Prevost presided over the inauguration of the Augustinian University in the capital city of the Democratic Republic of Congo, Kinshasa, in 2009.

This story was first published by ACI Africa, CNA's news partner in Africa, and has been adapted by CNA.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=291208&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Jan 13, 2026 / 13:11 pm (CNA).

Archbishop Bernard Hebda of St. Paul and Minneapolis described a pervasive "heaviness" in the community over federal agents' deadly shooting of a U.S. citizen.

In his pastoral reflection on Jan. 12, the archbishop said he was on retreat with regional bishops last week when the shooting of Renee Good by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement official occurred.

"I find myself Googling 'Minneapolis' every few hours to learn of the latest developments in a situation that truly tears at the heart," he wrote, noting that some parishes with large Latino populations are seeing fewer than 50% of usual congregants at recent Masses.

"I hope that you might think about contacting any of our parishes serving immigrant communities to see how you might support them in their ministry," Hebda wrote.

During the retreat, he said he prayed for consolation for the Good family, wisdom for political leaders, prudence and safety for law enforcement, temperance among protesters, healing for those wounded by political divisions (especially young people), and courage for immigrants living in fear of deportation.

Hebda said he also prayed for parish priests, deacons, educators, and others who are navigating these tensions while striving to "bring the light of the Gospel and the balm of Jesus' love into these difficult situations."

After the shooting last week, Hebda in a statement pleaded for "all people of goodwill to join me in prayer for the person who was killed, for their loved ones, and for our community."

"We continue to be at a time in this country when we need to lower the temperature of rhetoric, stop fear-filled speculation, and start seeing all people as created in the image and likeness of God," he said.

Good was behind the wheel of an SUV after dropping off her 6-year-old at school when she was killed. Dueling narratives emerged, with the president and Homeland Security secretary saying the ICE officer's actions were justified against an "act of domestic terrorism," while Democratic officials said the administration is lying and urged the public to review videos of the shooting themselves.

In his Jan. 12 letter, the prelate noted the "providential" timing of the Church's psalm response at this past Sunday's Mass: "The Lord will bless his people with peace" (Psalm 29), adding: "I am confident that the Lord keeps his promises, but I am hoping that he won't keep us waiting too long. Maybe I should be praying for patience."

To address the ongoing wounds, the archdiocese hosted Bishop Andrew Cozzens of the Diocese of Crookston on Monday evening for a public presentation titled "A Wounded Church: Finding Peace and Healing," originally intended to address the shooting that occurred during the all-school Mass at Annunciation Church in August 2025. The event began with a Mass and concluded with Eucharistic adoration.

"How providential that the evening event, planned months ago, would have been scheduled to coincide with this challenging time," Hebda remarked in his letter. Cozzens also led a morning of recollection for archdiocesan staff on Jan. 13 on the same theme.

The archbishop urged the faithful to support immigrant parishes facing sharp declines in attendance since early December.

"A number of parishioners expressed to me their concerns about how the parishes will be able to continue their excellent ministry and outreach to the needy if Mass attendance (and offertory) remains low," he wrote. "I am confident that it would be a shot in the arm for them if you could join them some weekend."

Hebda also requested continued prayers for Father Greg Schaffer, an archdiocesan priest serving at a mission parish in Venezuela. Amid heightened dangers following the Trump administration's military operation that led to the capture of President Nicolás Maduro on Jan. 3, the U.S. State Department has warned of risks for Americans, prompting the archbishop to ask for prayers for Schaffer.

Daniel Payne contributed to this story.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=291195&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Jan 12, 2026 / 18:07 pm (CNA).

Archbishop Paul Coakley and President Donald Trump met on Jan. 12 to discuss areas of "mutual concern," which likely included topics related to immigration enforcement and Venezuela's sovereignty.

The archbishop of Oklahoma City, Coakley, who was elected president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) in November 2025, visited with Trump at the White House on Monday.

Chieko Noguchi, USCCB spokesperson, said in a statement after the meeting: "Archbishop Coakley had the opportunity for introductory meetings with President Trump, Vice President [JD] Vance, and other administration officials, in which they discussed areas of mutual concern, as well as areas for further dialogue. Archbishop Coakley is grateful for the engagement and looks forward to ongoing discussions."

The meeting was closed to the press, but White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt told EWTN reporter Owen Jensen she would ask the president about providing a readout of the meeting.

Pope Leo XIV has said immigrants must be treated with dignity and encouraged all people in the United States to heed the U.S. bishops' message on immigration.

Coakley, appearing on CBS News' "Face the Nation" on Dec. 21, 2025, predicted immigration would be a discussion topic with Trump and said: "I think we have opportunities to work together. We have opportunities to speak frankly with one another."

After U.S. military action to capture Venezuela's president, the pope on Jan. 4 called for full respect for Venezuela's national sovereignty and for the human and civil rights of its people.

Earlier in the day on Jan. 12, Pope Leo XIV met with Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado at the Vatican.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=291193&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Jan 12, 2026 / 13:29 pm (CNA).

In a case with implications for religious freedom, institutional autonomy, and health care access across Canada, a British Columbia Supreme Court trial starting Jan. 12 will consider whether faith-based hospitals can be forced to provide euthanasia on site.

The case, Gaye O'Neill et al. v. His Majesty the King in Right of the Province of British Columbia, Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, and Providence Health Care Society, arises from the death of a terminally ill woman who sought medical assistance in dying (MAID) while receiving care at St. Paul's Hospital in Vancouver. Because St. Paul's is a Catholic facility that does not provide assisted suicide, the patient was transferred to another health care facility that offered MAID. Her family and co-plaintiffs allege the transfer caused "unnecessary pain and distress" and argue that the policy allowing faith-based facilities to opt out of MAID violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The co-defendants in the case are the Providence Health Care Society, the Catholic denominational authority that operates St. Paul's and 16 other facilities, the B.C. Ministry of Health, and the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority (VCH).

Trial proceedings are scheduled to run from Jan. 12 to Feb. 6. While the legality of MAID itself is not being challenged, the court must decide whether publicly funded, faith-based hospitals can maintain MAID-free spaces or whether the state's duty to provide access overrides institutional conscience rights.

Central to the defense is a 1995 Master Agreement between the B.C. government and denominational health providers. The agreement formally recognizes the right of faith-based facilities to preserve the spiritual nature of the facility and governs how services incompatible with a facility's religious identity are handled, typically through transfer rather than on-site provision.

Supporters of the current system argue that this pluralistic model protects the diversity of care available to British Columbians.

The Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops in 2023 released a statement reiterating its opposition to euthanasia in Catholic hospitals. Vancouver Archbishop J. Michael Miller noted that the bishops had already drawn a line in the sand at their September plenary meeting when they stated unanimously that MAID would not be delivered at Catholic hospitals.

The new statement formalized that stance by saying the bishops "unanimously and unequivocally oppose the performance of either euthanasia or assisted suicide (MAID) within health organizations with a Catholic identity."

The case has drawn a large number of interveners, reflecting its potential national impact on the future of denominational health care in Canada.

The Christian Legal Fellowship (CLF) will argue for the protection of associational religious freedom, suggesting that institutions, like individuals, possess a right to collective conscience. CLF has said that forcing a religious community to act against its foundational beliefs has dehumanizing consequences and undermines the purpose for which such institutions exist.

The Canadian Physicians for Life and the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada are expected to focus on the sanctity of life and the integrity of the medical profession, arguing that a health care system that mandates the ending of life within all its facilities risks failing to protect the most vulnerable.

Conversely, the B.C. Humanist Association has called for the provincial government to "tear up" the 1995 Master Agreement, arguing that it undermines the government's duty of religious neutrality. "No one should suffer needlessly at the end of life," said executive director Ian Bushfield, adding that the state should not put the interests of religious institutions ahead of individual rights.

The Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA), also intervening, plans to challenge whether a publicly funded organization can claim standalone religious protections independent of its staff. The CCLA will argue that ascribing religious rights to an institution whose primary purpose is health delivery poses inevitable difficulties for state neutrality.

The Delta Hospice Society (DHS) has introduced a distinct legal argument, suggesting that section 7 of the Charter, which protects the right to life, liberty, and security of the person, should protect a patient's right to access a MAID-free environment.

"There are many terminally ill palliative care patients who desire to spend their final days without being asked if they want their life ended by their health care provider," said constitutional lawyer Allison Pejovic, representing the society. DHS argues that for many patients, a space free of euthanasia is a requirement for psychological security of the person.

The trial comes as construction continues on the new $2.18 billion St. Paul's Hospital at its new site. The B.C. government has indicated it remains committed to the project's Catholic identity, despite the ongoing litigation.

Evidence and testimony will be heard through early February, with the court expected to receive final written submissions in the spring.

This story was first published by The Catholic Register and has been reprinted by CNA with permission.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=291191&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Jan 12, 2026 / 06:00 am (CNA).

Catholic medical professionals and ethicists had mixed reactions to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) announcement last week that it has revised the recommended childhood and adolescent vaccine schedule.

In a press release on Jan. 5, the CDC announced a revised recommended childhood immunization schedule, which reduces the number of universally recommended vaccines from 18 to 11. It retains routine recommendations for all children against measles, mumps, rubella, polio, pertussis, tetanus, diphtheria, Haemophilus influenzae type b, pneumococcal disease, human papillomavirus (HPV), and varicella (chickenpox).

Vaccines for rotavirus, influenza, COVID-19, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, meningococcal disease, and RSV now shift to recommendations for high-risk groups or after "shared clinical decision-making" between providers and families.

According to a Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) memo, the CDC "applies shared clinical decision-making recommendations when evidence indicates that individuals may benefit from vaccination based on an analysis of the individual's characteristics, values, and preferences, the provider's medical judgment, and the characteristics of the vaccine being considered."

Insurance companies must continue to cover all vaccines.

The changes come after President Donald Trump directed the heads of the CDC and HHS in December 2025 to "review best practices from peer, developed nations regarding childhood vaccination recommendations and the scientific evidence underlying those practices" and to make changes accordingly.

After reviewing the vaccination practices of 20 peer nations, a scientific assessment found that "the U.S. is a global outlier among developed nations in both the number of diseases addressed in its routine childhood vaccination schedule and the total number of recommended doses but does not have higher vaccination rates than such countries."

"Science demands continuous evaluation," Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), said in the CDC press release. "This decision commits NIH, CDC, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to gold standard science, greater transparency, and ongoing reassessment as new data emerge."

Dr. Tim Millea, chair of the health care policy committee at the Catholic Medical Association (CMA), welcomed the changes, telling CNA that he thought the CDC approached the revisions "in a very logical way."

"There has been a huge drop in trust surrounding vaccines since the COVID-19 pandemic," Millea said. "The suggestions during COVID that the science was 'settled' rubbed a lot of us the wrong way."

"The loudest critics of these new recommendations say this is ideology over science," he said. "Science is a process, not an end. If we need more evidence, let's get it," he said, pointing out Bhattacharya's call for "gold standard" science and "ongoing reassessment."

Millea, a retired orthopedic surgeon, said he has confidence that Bhattacharya and Dr. Marty Makary, head of the FDA, are "not going to let ideology get ahead of science."

The president of the National Catholic Bioethics Center (NCBC), John Di Camillo, told CNA in a statement regarding the updated immunization recommendations: "The people look to public health authorities precisely for this kind of guidance, which is responsive to continually evolving research, ongoing discussions among professionals in the medical field, and ethical principles that promote the common good, respect the dignity of the human person, and limit the interference of financial and ideological conflicts."

'Let those closest to the children make the decisions'

Millea acknowledged that critics of the CDC's revised recommendations say comparing the U.S. vaccine schedule to that of much smaller, more homogeneous nations such as Denmark is like "comparing apples to oranges."

However, he pointed out that the CDC's revised schedule is simply a recommendation, and each of the 50 U.S. states is free to do what it deems best. "It's like 50 laboratories. Let's see what works the best."

Invoking the Catholic principle of subsidiarity, Millea said "let those closest to the children who are getting the vaccinations make the decisions."

"One of the positive aspects of the pandemic is that now we can take a step back and we're questioning, not because something may be wrong, but maybe because it could be improved upon," Millea said.

John F. Brehany, executive vice president and director of Institutional Relations at the NCBC, told CNA that "the new schedule appears to have been designed with good intent; that is, … to have gained public trust in the absence of mandates and to have contributed to population health outcomes that meet or exceed those of the U.S."

"The new schedule does not take a 'one size fits all' approach but rather structures recommendations based on the nature of the diseases, vaccines in question, and characteristics of the children or patients who may receive them," he continued. "This approach appears to be well-founded and to provide a sound foundation for respecting the dignity and rights of every unique human person."

This will 'sow more confusion'

Dr. Gwyneth Spaeder, a Catholic pediatrician in North Carolina, did not welcome the changes to the immunization schedule.

While she acknowledged that the damage to trust in institutions was substantial after the COVID-19 pandemic, she thinks the issues surrounding the COVID-19 vaccine's safety and efficacy "cannot be compared" with the decades of studies demonstrating the safety of common children's immunizations.

"It is not the same moral calculus," she said.

She does not believe revising the immunization schedule this way will restore trust in institutions, which she said might take "years or even generations" to rebuild.

This method will "sow more confusion," Spaeder said. "Instead of trying to rebuild trust in transparent, evidence-based practices, we have created a situation where everyone is told different things … For this child, we think this schedule is the best, for that child, there's a different one. That's not how public health works."

She also said that comparing the homogeneous, relatively tiny population of 6 million in Denmark to that of the diverse population of 340 million in the U.S. is "a false comparison."

"Their children are at less risk from falling through the cracks and contracting these diseases we try to vaccinate against," she said, noting the protective public health effects of Denmark's universal health care and generous parental leave policies.

"The children who will be most harmed in the U.S. are the underserved," Spaeder said. "That's being lost in this conversation. We can have a lot of high-level political arguments, but I am most concerned about my patients from single-parent homes who attend day care from young ages, or who are born to mothers who don't have adequate prenatal care."

"They will lose out the most from not being protected from these diseases."

Full Article