Catholic News

NEW DELHI, India — The Catholic Church in India has described as "misleading" a Supreme Court ruling that reaffirmed Dalit Christians have no right to the constitutional protections and government benefits reserved for lower-caste Hindus, Sikhs, and Buddhists.

Dalit Christians account for more than two-thirds of India's approximately 35 million Christians, and the ruling has generated widespread concern in the community.

"The Supreme Court's judgment on Dalit Christians is very much misleading to the general public, because it is an individual case and doesn't come on our ground," the Commission for Scheduled Castes of the Catholic Bishops' Conference of India (CBCI) said in a March 31 statement.

On March 24, a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court ruled in Chinthada Anand v. State of Andhra Pradesh that a person cannot simultaneously profess a religion other than Hinduism, Sikhism, or Buddhism and claim membership in a Scheduled Caste.

The case involved a Christian pastor born into the Madiga community, a Scheduled Caste in Andhra Pradesh, who sought protection under the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act after alleging he was assaulted with caste-based slurs. The court upheld a lower-court ruling quashing his complaint, finding that his conversion to Christianity resulted in the loss of his Scheduled Caste status.

Father Bijoy Kumar Nayak, secretary of the CBCI Commission for Dalits, told EWTN News that "this is not a verdict on our decades-old demand. The court made this observation while dismissing the appeal of a convert pastor who sought protection under the Atrocities Against Dalits."

"We have been fighting for the last 75 years … for the constitutional rights that were denied by the presidential order of 1950. Our case is in the honorable Supreme Court … the appeal of the cause based on the constitutional rights," the commission said.

Despite the ruling, the commission expressed confidence in an eventual resolution. "We have hope in God as well as in judiciary that the justice will be done to the Dalit Christians," the commission's statement said.

What is at stake

"Dalit," literally meaning "trampled upon," refers to communities at the bottom of India's traditional caste hierarchy, historically treated as "untouchables" and relegated to menial jobs such as scavenging while living in segregation from upper castes.

In 1950, the Indian government issued a presidential order designating Hindu Dalits as "Scheduled Castes," making them eligible for free education, a 15% quota in government jobs, and reserved seats in legislatures. Those protections were extended to Sikh Dalits in 1956 and Buddhist Dalits in 1990 but have been denied to Muslim and Christian Dalits.

Christian and civil rights groups have challenged the constitutionality of this exclusion. A petition filed in the Supreme Court in 2004 demanding an end to discrimination against Dalit Christians remains pending before a three-judge bench.

Franklin Caesar Thomas, the Dalit Catholic lawyer who filed the 2004 petition, told EWTN News from southern Tamil Nadu state that the latest ruling has no bearing on the broader constitutional challenge.

"This order has created a lot of confusion and fear among the people. But it does not have any legal impact," Caesar Thomas said.

He noted that past inquiry commissions, including the Justice Ranganath Misra Commission, "have clearly stated that conversion to Christianity does not end caste discrimination in society."

Government commission still pending

However, the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party government that came to power in 2014 demanded a fresh inquiry during the continued court hearing. A new commission under Justice K.G. Balakrishnan, a former chief justice of India, was established in October 2022 to study the social status of converts. The commission has yet to submit its report, with the latest deadline set for April 10.

The concern generated by the Supreme Court's remarks was evident in Indian Currents, a Catholic sociopolitical weekly, which published several critical articles about the verdict.

"The recent judgment of the Supreme Court to continue the marginalization of those in the peripheries based on their religious identity is revelatory in itself," the magazine's editorial said.

A decades-long struggle

Since 1990, when Buddhists were included in the Scheduled Caste category, the Catholic Church in India has waged vigorous campaigns for the same recognition for Christian Dalits, with Aug. 10 observed annually as a "black day" with protests across the country. Thousands of demonstrators have been brought to New Delhi each year, led by bishops, to press the demand.

During a 2013 march to Parliament, police in New Delhi sprayed dirty water from water cannons on protesting priests in cassocks and other Dalit Christian demonstrators — images that Dalit Christian advocates say illustrate the institutional bias against their cause.

The CBCI's biennial assembly in Bangalore in February 2026 reiterated the Church's position.

"The denial of rights to Dalit Christians continues for decades as an indirect form of discrimination, despite numerous appeals for equality and justice. We express our concerns about the denial of rights to the minorities, as such acts weaken the democratic fabric of our society," the assembly's statement said.

Full Article

Canada's bishops told the Supreme Court of Canada that Quebec's secularism legislation Bill 21 "denies the divine" going well beyond provincial jurisdiction by imposing an anti-religious ideology on the province.

The bishops were among more than 50 intervenors presenting arguments at a landmark Supreme Court of Canada hearing into the constitutionality of Quebec's 2019 secularism law. The hearing, one of the longest in the court's history, ran from March 23–26. The court reserved its decision, with a ruling expected later this year.

The secularism law, which lower courts have twice upheld, prohibits certain public employees — such as teachers and police officers — from wearing religious symbols while at work.

Toronto lawyer Phil Horgan, president and general counsel of the Catholic Civil Rights League (CCRL), argued on behalf of the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops (CCCB), summarizing a factum that argued the "purpose and effect" of Quebec's legislation is to "amend Canada's federal constitution by imposing an anti-religious, non-neutral ideology, which goes beyond Québec's jurisdiction."

Such a "drastic" change can only be made by the federal government using its authority over criminal law or its constitutional "peace, order, and good government" powers, according to the bishops' argument.

Quebec preemptively invoked the notwithstanding clause of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms when it drafted Bill 21 to shield it from judicial review.

Federal and provincial governments can invoke the notwithstanding clause of the Constitution to temporarily prevent courts from invalidating legislation as unconstitutional.

The timing and impact of the use of Charter Section 33 became a significant issue during the four days of hearings and will likely be central in the court's analysis, Horgan told The Catholic Register.

The appellants challenging Bill 21 include individual teachers directly affected by it as well as advocacy groups including the National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM), the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA), and the Legal Committee of the Coalition Inclusion Québec. They argue Bill 21 is "ultra vires," beyond the powers of provincial jurisdiction.

In a five-minute oral argument, Horgan told the seven justices that "Canada's existing federal constitution is pluralist and pro-religion." Although "the doctrine of state neutrality is well established, Canada has never adopted laicity or an absolutist separation of church and state," he said.

Justice Malcolm Rowe questioned Horgan on the point, asking: "Other than the reference to the supremacy of God in the preamble to the Charter, would you direct me to the provision in the Constitution which is pro-religion?"

Horgan cited Section 93 of the Constitution Act, 1867, which protects denominational school rights and privileges, and noted federal charity law recognizes religion as a public good.

Horgan said he wasn't concerned by the pushback, noting judges often ask questions "not so much to get the answers from counsel but to help … persuade other members of the bench on some of the merits of the argument."

In its factum, the CCCB said Bill 21 "turns the expression of religious belief, through the wearing of symbols, into something to be punished because such expression now conflicts with the dominant philosophical posture of laïcité."

Just as religious symbols are an illustration of underlying personal faith, "the prohibition of religious symbols manifests an outlook from the provincial government that denies the divine," the bishops said.

Quebec has argued the notwithstanding clause disqualifies courts from weighing in on matters deemed political debates. Isabelle Brunet, a lawyer for the Quebec government, told the justices: "It is not up to a court to answer a question that doesn't concern the courts."

Quebec received support from the attorneys general of Alberta, Ontario, and Saskatchewan, who maintain the courts should not interfere once the notwithstanding clause is invoked.

Alberta and Ontario take a contrary position, arguing there is nothing in the notwithstanding clause that precludes judicial scrutiny of legislation.

Guy J. Pratte, a lawyer for the attorney general of Canada, said Section 33 gives legislatures the power to override Charter rights but does not nullify the rights altogether or prevent judges from issuing an opinion if freedoms are violated.

'Imposing an anti-religious, non-neutral ideology'

The following excerpts are from the factum submitted to the Supreme Court of Canada by the Canadian bishops:

• "The purpose and effect of the act is unilaterally to amend Canada's federal constitution by imposing an anti-religious, non-neutral ideology, which goes beyond Québec's jurisdiction."
• "When a province makes itself laïc, it is adopting a non-neutral stance on religion. The provinces do not have that power."
• "Québec is attempting to impose an atheistic posture on religious believers."
• "Our constitution is founded on a political theory that sees fundamental rights and freedoms as God-given. To adopt an expressly anti-religious viewpoint, as the act purports to do, is an amendment of our existing federal constitution."
• "In the place of a genuinely neutral, pluralist, and pro-religious approach, the act substitutes an anti-religious constitutional settlement where symbols of religion worn by individuals are not permitted."
• "Just as religious symbols manifest an underlying personal faith, the prohibition of religious symbols manifests an outlook … that denies the divine."

This story was first published by The B.C. Catholic and is reprinted here with permission.

Full Article

Pope Leo XIV on Holy Thursday returned the Mass of the Lord's Supper to the Basilica of St. John Lateran, reviving a papal practice last observed there in 2012 under Benedict XVI.

Departing from Pope Francis' custom of celebrating the liturgy in prisons or migrant centers, Leo celebrated the rite in the cathedral of Rome and washed the feet of 12 priests of the Diocese of Rome.

In his homily, the pope framed the liturgy as the solemn entrance into the Easter Triduum and said Christ's love, shown in both the Eucharist and the washing of the feet, reveals the justice of God in a world wounded by evil.

"This evening's solemn liturgy marks our entry into the holy Triduum of the Lord's passion, death, and resurrection," Leo said. "We cross this threshold not as mere spectators, nor out of habit, but as those personally invited by Jesus himself as guests at the Supper in which bread and wine become for us the sacrament of salvation."

"His love becomes both gesture and nourishment for all, revealing the justice of God," the pope said. "In this world, and particularly in those places where evil abounds, Jesus loves definitively — forever, and with his whole being."

Reflecting on the washing of the feet, Leo said the gesture is not simply a moral lesson but a revelation of God's own way of loving.

"What the Lord shows us — taking the water, the basin, and the towel — is far more than a moral example," he said. "He entrusts to us his very way of life. The washing of the feet is a gesture that encapsulates the revelation of God."

The pope also cited Benedict XVI, recalling that Christians must repeatedly learn that God's greatness is unlike worldly greatness. "We too must 'learn repeatedly that God's greatness is different from our idea of greatness… because we systematically desire a God of success and not of the Passion,'" Leo said.

He warned that human beings are tempted to seek a God who grants success, victory, or usefulness like wealth and power rather than recognizing the divine power revealed in humble service.

"Yet we fail to perceive that God does indeed serve us through the gratuitous and humble gesture of washing feet," Leo said. "This is the true omnipotence of God."

The pope said Jesus' action purifies both humanity's false image of God and its false image of man.

"For we tend to consider ourselves powerful when we dominate, victorious when we destroy our equals, great when we are feared," he said. "In contrast, as true God and true man, Christ offers us the example of self-giving, service, and love."

Leo stressed that Christ gave this example not in a moment of acclaim but "on the night he was betrayed, in the darkness of incomprehension and violence."

"In this way, it becomes clear that the Lord's love precedes our own goodness or purity; he loves us first, and in that love, he forgives and restores us," the pope said.

Quoting St. John's Gospel, Leo urged Christians to live out mutual service in imitation of Christ: "He does not ask us to repay him but to share his gift among ourselves: 'You also ought to wash one another's feet.'"

The pope also referred to Pope Francis' 2013 Holy Thursday homily, noting that Christian service cannot be reduced to abstraction or empty obligation but must spring from charity.

Allowing oneself to be served by the Lord, Leo said, is a precondition for serving others. "By washing our bodies, Jesus purifies our souls," he said. "In him, God has given us an example — not of how to dominate, but of how to liberate; not of how to destroy life, but of how to give it."

In one of the homily's strongest appeals, the pope turned to the suffering of those crushed by violence and oppression.

"As humanity is brought to its knees by so many acts of brutality, let us too kneel down as brothers and sisters alongside the oppressed," he said.

Leo said the liturgy of Holy Thursday draws together the institution of the Eucharist and holy orders, revealing "the perfect self-gift of Jesus, the High Priest and living, eternal Eucharist."

Addressing priests directly, he said: "Beloved brothers in the priesthood, we are called to serve the people of God with our whole lives."

He concluded by inviting Catholics to spend time in Eucharistic adoration and to ask for the grace to imitate Christ's love.

"Holy Thursday is therefore a day of fervent gratitude and authentic fraternity," the pope said. "May this evening's Eucharistic adoration, in every parish and community, be a time to contemplate Jesus' gesture, kneeling as he did, and to ask for the strength to imitate his service with the same love."

This story was first published by ACI Stampa, the Italian-language sister service of EWTN News. It has been translated and adapted by EWTN News English.

Full Article

California will pay $4.5 million to a Catholic legal advocacy firm after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the state could not continue to hide student transgender identities from parents.

In March the Supreme Court blocked California's rules that forbid schools from informing parents if their children believed themselves to be the opposite sex.

The high court had held that parents enjoy "the right not to be shut out of participation in decisions regarding their children's mental health." The ruling upheld a similar order issued in December 2025 by U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez.

On March 31, the Thomas More Society — which had represented the plaintiffs in the class-action suit against the California rules — announced that Benitez had ordered California to pay $4.52 million in attorneys' fees to the Catholic legal firm.

In his order, Benitez said he was "well familiar" with the yearslong lawsuit. He said California was guilty of "litigation intransigence" while fighting the lawsuit, such as "wasting scarce judicial resources" and "resisting at all junctures."

The state has "continue[d] to fight" over the case even after the Supreme Court ruling, Benitez pointed out, including claiming that the Supreme Court-approved injunction is "flawed and needs to be modified."

The $4.5 million fee was arrived at after applying a "multiplier" of 1.25 to a base fee of around $3.6 million. Multipliers are often applied in certain high-risk or otherwise notable legal disputes.

Peter Breen, litigation head at the Thomas More Society, said the massive award "sends an unmistakable message to state governments and school districts across the country: If you trample the constitutional rights of parents, you will pay for it — literally."

"California threw everything it had at this case," Breen said. "It lost at summary judgment, lost at the Supreme Court, and now Californians will foot the bill for their government officials' refusal to respect the fundamental rights of families."

In December 2025, Benitez had said the case concerned "a parent's rights to information … against a public school's policy of secrecy when it comes to a student's gender identification."

Teachers have historically informed parents of "physical injuries or questions about a student's health and well-being," the judge pointed out, yet lawmakers in California had enacted policies "prohibiting public school teachers from informing parents" when their child claimed to have an LGBT identity.

Full Article

Teenagers and young adults are obtaining abortion pills through telehealth at high rates, a recent report found.

The report, published in the journal JAMA Health Forum, looked at telehealth abortion requests for an online provider across three age groups (ages 15–17, 18–24, and 25–49). The report found that young adults (ages 18–24) order abortion medication at much higher rates than older adults and that more teenagers order abortion pills in states with parental notification or consent laws around abortion.

The study found a "growing demand among adolescents and young adults in legally constrained environments."

"Young people appear to increasingly rely on online telemedicine services for abortion care, with compounding legal restrictions driving higher demand," the report read.

Michael New, senior associate scholar at Charlotte Lozier Institute and assistant professor at The Catholic University of America, told EWTN News that the report shows how abortion pills "undermine abortion bans and heartbeat laws" and "pro-life parental involvement laws that are in effect in over 30 states."

For minor girls ages 15–17 requesting abortion pills, New pointed out that "the largest increase was seen in states that had both parental consent laws and parental notice laws."

"Overall online requests for chemical abortion pills increased after the Dobbs decision," New noted. "However, states that had some sort of parental involvement law had considerably larger increases than states with no parental involvement law."

This can put women at risk, he said.

"There are serious public health concerns with giving minor girls access to chemical abortions by telehealth," New said. "Minor girls who are seeking abortions via telehealth are often doing so to conceal their pregnancy or their sexual activity from their parents. As such, they might be less likely to seek medical attention if complications occur. This increases the health risks involved with obtaining an abortion."

Multiple studies indicate high rates of hospitalizations for women taking the abortion pills. Chemical abortion has a complication rate four times that of surgical abortion, according to one study. Another report found that abortion pill complications are often underreported or misclassified.

"Overall, research has shown that chemical abortions pills taken under in-person medical supervision have a much higher complication rate than surgical abortions," New said. "The fact that minor girls are obtaining chemical abortion pills online without in-person medical supervision only increases those risks."

Tennessee telehealth abortion liability bill heads to governor

A Tennessee bill that would allow civil action against out-of-state abortion drug suppliers is heading to Gov. Bill Lee's desk.

The bill, sponsored by Republican Rep. Gino Bulso of Brentwood, would make abortion pill suppliers liable in wrongful-death lawsuits. It would allow family members of an unborn baby, including the biological mother, to sue the abortion pill provider, allowing for statutory damages of at least $1 million for a wrongful-death lawsuit. It would also make it a Class E felony to knowingly mail abortion-inducing drugs to someone in Tennessee.

Though the state already has strong legal protections for unborn children, Bulso said that "mail-order abortions continue to kill thousands of innocent unborn children every year." Bulso called the bill "a critical step in our efforts to promote life, protect women, and ensure morality defines our laws."

Kansas lawmakers override governor's veto of pregnancy center protections

Hours after Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly vetoed a bill to protect conscience rights for pregnancy centers, the state House and Senate voted to override the veto.

Based on model legislation, the CARE Act is designed to ensure that pregnancy centers are not targeted for their life-affirming beliefs. The bill prevents any government rule or division from targeting centers or forcing them to perform abortions. The bill affirms that "pregnancy centers serve women with integrity and compassion in this state and across the United States."

There are more than 50 pregnancy centers serving women and families in Kansas and an estimated 3,000 centers in the U.S.

United Kingdom lawmakers call for delay on abortion bill

In the U.K. Parliament, lawmakers called for a delay in an abortion clause that could effectively legalize abortion up to birth, according to the bill's opponents.

A cross-party group of members of Parliament (MPs) and members of the House of Lords (peers) called on the government to delay the clause in an open letter to Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood and Health Minister Wes Streeting. In England and Wales, abortions after 24 weeks are a criminal offense. Though the bill does not directly remove the 24-week limit for abortion, it would remove any legal sanction on women aborting their children outside the legal time frame.

The letter, which had 79 signatories from different parties, said that Clause 246 (formerly Clause 208) would create ambiguities that need to be addressed. The letter warned that the new clause could lead to cases of infanticide going undetected and raises questions about cases like women being pressured into abortions.

"Since the advent of the abortion 'pills by post' scheme, disturbing cases of women inducing their own abortions outside the terms of the Abortion Act have already occurred," the letter read. "As there would no longer be a legal deterrent against such cases, there is a real danger that such instances will increase with tragic consequences for women and viable unborn babies."

The letter calls on the government to "hit pause" on the proposals and allow for "consultation, impact assessment, or meaningful scrutiny" and to draft guidance for police and health care professionals.

Full Article

A few prominent Catholics are scheduled to speak at a May 17 event on the National Mall in Washington, D.C., where President Donald Trump will rededicate the United States to "one nation, under God."

Speakers will include Diocese of Winona-Rochester, Minnesota, Bishop Robert Barron, founder of Word on Fire and member of the president's Religious Liberty Commission, and Father Mike Schmitz, a Catholic media figure and host of "The Bible in a Year" podcast, according to an announcement by the White House.

Jonathan Roumie, the Catholic actor who plays Jesus Christ on the television series "The Chosen," will also speak at the event. Cardinal Timothy Dolan will provide a video address for the event.

The programming for the event will include talks about Christianity in American history and the Christian faith of American historical figures along with prayers and Christian music.

Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and House Speaker Mike Johnson are scheduled to speak as well.

"Our mission is to gather the nation in prayer and worship, to have a moment reflecting on God's providence in the birth and preservation of the United States, and this is really our opportunity to unite the country and rededicate our nation to God," Justin Caporale, executive producer for major events and public appearances for the White House, said in a media call.

Some Protestant speakers expected include Pastor Jack Graham, Samuel Rodriguez, and Eric Metaxas. There will also be a video address by Franklin Graham. There will be musical performances by Chris Tomlin, Blessing Offor, and the U.S. Navy Band.

Trump announced the "Rededicate 250" event in February during the National Prayer Breakfast, which coincides with broader celebrations to honor the 250th anniversary of the Founding Fathers signing the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776. The Rededicate 250 event organizer, Freedom 250, is a nonprofit subsidiary of the National Park Foundation.

"When our founders proclaimed the immortal truths that echoed around the world and down all the way through time, they declared that all of us are made free and equal by the hand of our Creator," Trump said at the Feb. 4 breakfast.

Last September, Trump also launched the "America Prays" initiative, which asks Americans to create groups to dedicate one hour of prayer every week for the United States and its people leading up to the Fourth of July anniversary.

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) launched separate events to honor the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.

In February, the USCCB asked parishes to contribute to 250 collective hours of adoration and 250 collective works of mercy in the lead up to the Fourth of July. The bishops asked parishes to report participation in the initiative and inform them of the fruits of the prayers and actions.

On July 12, the bishops will also reconsecrate the United States to the Sacred Heart of Jesus as part of the solemnity. This will occur during Mass at the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington, D.C.

Full Article

Pope Leo XIV on Holy Thursday returned the Mass of the Lord's Supper to the Basilica of St. John Lateran, reviving a papal practice last observed there in 2012 under Benedict XVI.

Departing from Pope Francis' custom of celebrating the liturgy in prisons or migrant centers, Leo celebrated the rite in the cathedral of Rome and washed the feet of 12 priests of the Diocese of Rome.

Full Article

Catholic activists have complained of "persecution" and "a clear bias against Christianity" in a controversy over public prayer in the U.K. following a recent outdoor Islamic prayer service in London.

When thousands of Muslims took part in a prayer service in London's Trafalgar Square in March to mark Iftar, the meal that breaks the Ramadan fast, the event was hosted by London Mayor Sadiq Khan. It was also welcomed by political leaders, with Prime Minister Keir Starmer highlighting the Trafalgar Square event as an example of "the great strength of our diverse city and country."

Starmer added that he would sack anyone from his "team" who said "Muslims praying in public … are not welcome." Defending the event against outside criticism, Labour Member of Parliament (MP) Stella Creasy said: "Muslims should be as free as Christians, Sikhs, and Jews to celebrate their faith in Trafalgar Square."

Criticizing the response to the event, Paul Sapper, ADF International communications officer, told EWTN News: "There is a two-tier bias in how many in our political class view public prayer and freedom of religion. Mass Islamic prayer is defended and celebrated as characteristic of 'our tolerant and diverse country,' while the silent prayer of solitary Christians is criminalized."

Many Catholics have taken particular issue with the comments made by Creasy, the pro-abortion MP who was responsible for pushing a law that banned silent prayer outside abortion facilities. Under Section 9(1)(a) of the Public Order Act, which became law in October 2024, "influencing" any person wishing to access an abortion facility became illegal, leaving pro-life activists concerned that silent prayer would be considered a crime.

These concerns were realized when British army veteran Adam Smith-Connor was found guilty of breaching a local buffer zone in October 2024 by praying silently outside an abortion clinic and given a fine of almost $12,000. This was followed, in December 2025, by police charging Catholic campaigner Isabel Vaughan-Spruce, 48, from Worcestershire, for silently praying in an abortion clinic "buffer zone" under the Public Order Act 2023. The date for her trial has been set for October.

Sapper complained that the celebration by "the political establishment" of "mass Islamic prayer" while supporting buffer zones "shows a clear bias against Christianity," adding: "The undeniable reality is that 'buffer zone' legislation is being used in this country to ban silent Christian prayer in what is the most egregious example of censorship in Britain today. 'Buffer zones' are used to censor not only speech but also people's most intimate thoughts, as the examples of Adam and Isabel show. This is real-life thought-crime."

ADF International is a Christian legal advocacy organization that defends fundamental freedoms. ADF has legally supported Vaughan-Spruce and Smith-Connor as victims of 'buffer zone' censorship, with Sapper describing them as "peaceful Christians who merely silently prayed in a public space, as is their lawful right in a free country."

Highlighting Creasy's role in particular, Sapper added: "Stella Creasy introduced Section 9 of the Public Order Act (POA) 2023, which introduced 'buffer zones' around all abortion facilities in England and Wales. Creasy also voted against a specific amendment to POA 2023 which would have made it clear that silent prayer is not a crime."

"ADF International and many others warned that this would lead to the criminalization of silent prayer, and we sadly have been proved right. If anyone supports the criminalization of silent prayer and pretends to care about freedom of religion, they simply should not be believed," he said.

Backing Sapper's point, Vaughan-Spruce complained of the praise given to the Islamic event. She told EWTN News: "Politicians suddenly seem to be lining up to defend the right to pray in public — but only when it's Muslims doing the praying. I've been charged three times in connection with my silent prayers, arrested twice, and am now facing court again. Where are those same voices when it comes to defending my rights as a Christian?"

"We were told that buffer zones were needed to prevent harassment and intimidation, yet the only people being charged under this law are peaceful, prayerful Christians."

Responding to Creasy's comment that "buffer zones don't ban prayer," Vaughan-Spruce said: "If Ms. Creasy truly believes buffer zones don't ban prayer, then why has she been silent throughout my ordeal? I face court again for doing nothing more than silently praying on a public street. I would welcome support from Ms. Creasy if, true to her word, she believes buffer zones don't ban prayer."

Looking to the future, Vaughan-Spruce urged Catholics "to recognize the rights we do have and use them," adding: "So often it's our own fear or complacency which limits us. God himself tells us in Joshua 1:9: 'Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be afraid; do not be discouraged, for the Lord your God will be with you wherever you go.'"

Full Article

Builders AI Forum (BAIF), an organization bringing together some of the world's most consequential voices in artificial intelligence (AI) with visionary leaders of the Catholic Church, has announced the appointment of a new CEO, Vincent Higgins, a seasoned technology and AI executive.

Dedicated?to?providing?a?Catholic?moral?framework?for?the?use?of?artificial?intelligence,?BAIF works?"to?shape?AI's?trajectory?for?humanity,"?Higgins?told?EWTN News.

The group was founded in October 2024 by Matthew Harvey Sanders, CEO and founder of Longbeard, a Catholic AI company that built Magisterium AI. BAIF held its first major conference at the Vatican in November 2025.

EWTN News spoke with Higgins about his vision for BAIF and the rumor that Pope Leo XIV's first encyclical will be dedicated to the topic of AI.

EWTN News: What are some key issues you plan to focus on in your new role at BAIF?

Higgins: There are certain areas in our society that are being highly disrupted by AI right now. The very first has been software development; it has completely transformed that world, anything that's related to the creative social media, all those aspects. It's being very disruptive in education where the deposit of knowledge, say at a university, which was something that would be communicated through professors — a lot of that can be found in AI today. So why spend $80,000 on a degree?

Of course, there's many reasons to go to college — the social community aspect and many others. But it's going to be very disruptive to the economic model for universities as AI can create personalized learning, it can help you understand where your learning gaps are, what's missing in your knowledge and fill those gaps in a very personalized way based on your personality and your intellect, many other things. So, it's very disruptive both at the high school and the college level in terms of how AI will transform education...

We've only been at this a few years in terms of AI development and we're already seeing major changes in people losing their jobs and having to retool new careers and all sorts of things. You can imagine 10 years from now what that might look like. So, [there are] a lot of [things] to address.

So, [we want] to look at particularly those that are building AI, [that they] do it in an ethical and responsible way — what you might call "responsible AI" — so that it's at the service of humanity and not at the detriment of humanity.

Builders AI Forum is really unique and it's bringing together top leadership in AI ... with Church leaders, to benefit the Church. So, that the Church understands in a better way what's coming and can then be at the forefront of leadership in terms of leading the message — not behind the message, but in front of the message — in terms of teaching and deepening the understanding of the impact and how humans can flourish.

Pope Leo XIV's first encyclical is rumored to be about AI and Catholic social teaching — if true, what do you hope to see in it?

Obviously, we know why he chose his name, that "Leo XIV" came from his predecessor, Leo XIII, and that Rerum Novarum is one of the most important writings of all time when it comes to Catholic social teaching. There is a strong rumor that the encyclical, his first encyclical, will be on AI and that the title will be Magnifica Humanitas, which means "Magnificent Humanity."

Rerum Novarum came out [in 1891] on May 15. And so, I think there's a potential that [the new encyclical on AI] might be released also on May 15. Those are the rumors … It makes perfect sense that Magnifica Humanitas would be the title focusing on the beauty of humanity and what makes us different than a machine. Because when you shine a light on humanity and all of its beauty and depth and the treasury of the philosophical tradition of the Catholic Church, and you look at the probabilistic nature of AI, it pales in comparison. It's like night and day.

How does Pope Leo's witness in this area guide your approach to this new role?

As an organization we have identified the top 10 biggest concerns around AI as it relates to society, to human dignity, to humanity, and to the disruption that this technology is having and will have on our lives and our kids' and grandkids' lives. But as a very Catholic organization dedicated to serving the Church, we will take our cues and our lead from Holy Father and in particular this encyclical.

So we have our ideas on priorities, but the Builders AI Forum will take its true lead from Pope Leo and hopefully at some time in the future he'll be able to see us as kind of his "soldiers" in service to that mission that he took on when he took the role and chose his name.

Full Article

Delivering a eulogy at the beginning of his mother's funeral Mass this week, international soccer star Roy Keane spoke lovingly of his parents and his Catholic upbringing in Ireland.

After his mother died, he paid tribute on Instagram to her, writing under a photograph of them together: "You'll always be the boss."

The Requiem Mass for Marie Keane took place in the Church of the Resurrection in Farranree, Cork City, the same church where she and her late husband, Mossie, were married in 1963. He died in 2019. Their wedding photograph was placed on her coffin during the Mass.

In his eulogy, Keane said: "From a selfish point of view, we weren't ready for my mam to go yet. Today, we feel like the heart has been ripped out of our chest. Our mam would not want us to make a fuss today."

He continued: "Our mam played so many different roles in our lives. She was a wife, mother, sister, daughter, mother-in-law, and grandmother. She was pretty cool at all of them. We can take comfort in knowing she was so deeply loved. We mourn her, but we have to celebrate her life as well. Ultimately, our mam and dad were at their happiest when they were together. And they are together. God bless, mam — and thanks for everything you did for us."

Marie Keane passed away peacefully in the presence of her family at Marymount Hospice in Cork after suffering a long illness.

Roy Keane, who captained Manchester United during their most successful era and played for Ireland at the 1994 World Cup in the United States, is one of Ireland's most famous sportsmen. He grew up in Cork City. After a period managing and coaching at club and international level, he is now a soccer pundit on television.

In his autobiography, Keane talked about his faith. "Sometimes I don't know what's best for myself, and that's why I've got great faith; the man upstairs looks after me. I just have to trust him a bit more."

Notoriously private, Keane previously said in an interview that he attended Mass most Sundays. "I have to drag the kids along sometimes, but they are all very well-grounded because that is what my life is," he said.

In his address, he looked back on the parenting skills of his late mother and father with great affection: "Our mam didn't always [give] what we wanted but always gave us what we needed. She was pretty strict with us, and if we were up to no good, she had an amazing skill of throwing a shoe, and no matter where we were in the house, she would always hit the target."

Recalling a happy childhood growing up with his parents, Keane said: "Summer holidays to Garretstown were always special. In the evening, we would get a bag of chips. We thought life was great, just so simple. They would both be in great form. It was like going to Australia. We would also enjoy trips up to Dublin to the All-Ireland back in the days when Cork used to win. The only disappointment was our dad telling us once we got up to Dublin that we had no tickets for the match. But you can't have everything."

Thanking the wider family circle for their care, Keane said: "I have never known a closer family. Your help and support over the last couple of years has been a great example to us all. We will never be able to thank you enough. The turnout today has not surprised us. Our mam always looked out for other people. Not only was she kind and caring, but she had a good sense of humor, right up until the end."

Father Sean O'Sullivan, who celebrated the Requiem Mass, told mourners that Marie Keane was everything to her family. She cherished them "not for anything they had done or achieved" but simply for who they were.

"While our hearts expand to love others as we grow, there is a place in our hearts that forever belongs to our mother. That is what makes them so special. It also makes it hard to lose them," O'Sullivan said.

Keane's praise for his family, faith, and upbringing follows the Oscars ceremony in Hollywood last month where his fellow Irish star, Best Actress winner Jessie Buckley, paid a warm tribute to her parents and the beauty of motherhood in her acceptance speech.

Full Article