Catholic News

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=291393&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Jan 23, 2026 / 18:14 pm (CNA).

A broad range of life issues from abortion to euthanasia and more were represented at the March for Life 2026 in Washington, D.C., on Friday.

Alex Schadenberg, executive director of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition, expressed concern about a number of states across the country poised to legalize assisted suicide. "There are many states that the death lobby will be pushing for assisted suicide in 2026," he said.

"In 2026 we are very concerned about Virginia, Massachusetts, Nevada, and Connecticut, and other states," he said, adding: "2026 will require a unified effort to stop the expansion of killing by assisted suicide poisoning."

Ashley Kollme, a mother of five children from Bethesda, Maryland, shared the story of her pregnancy with her youngest daughter, Sophia, who is 2 years old.

"Sophia was diagnosed with a complex congenital heart condition when I was 23 weeks pregnant," Kollme said. "The first option that was presented to us was termination, and that was never an option that we would consider, and we chose life." Sophia has had two open heart surgeries and lots of other procedures, her mother said, adding: "And she is the light of our lives."

Kollme's two sons, Otto and Max, stood by with signs featuring pictures of their little sister.

Gesturing to the posters, which featured a professional photo of Sophia, Kollme said the little girl is "one of the poster children for Johns Hopkins Hospital."

Ultimately, Kollme said, "I think that we see a lot of ableism and abortion against people with disabilities, and I've become passionate about that because every child deserves a life."

"Deserving life shouldn't be conditional upon one's health," she said.

Mara Oswalt, a March for Life participant from Atlanta, held a sign saying "Unborn children die in ICE detention" and emphasized the need to recognize the dignity of all human life. "I've heard several instances of women having miscarriages because they are not eating well, they're not being treated well in ICE detention," Oswalt said.

Oswalt serves as creative director of Rehumanize International, an organization dedicated to fostering a culture of peace and life in accordance with the "consistent life ethic," which calls for opposition to threats against human life including abortion, capital punishment, euthanasia, embryonic stem cell research, unjust war, and torture.

"Those stories in particular really break my heart," she said. "I know those women wanted their children. They wanted them to be cared for. And so I didn't want them to be forgotten in this moment."

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=291392&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Jan 23, 2026 / 18:34 pm (CNA).

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced on Thursday that it will stop funding research that uses fetal tissue of aborted babies.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, National Institutes of Health (NIH) director, said in a Jan. 22 statement that the agency has "reexamined its approach related to the use of human fetal tissue in federally funded research."

"This decision is about advancing science by investing in breakthrough technologies more capable of modeling human health and disease," Bhattacharya added. "Under President Trump's leadership, taxpayer-funded research must reflect the best science of today and the values of the American people."

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. cited ethical and scientific reasons for the change.

"HHS is ending the use of human fetal tissue from elective abortions in agency-funded research and replacing it with gold-standard science," Kennedy said in a Jan. 23 statement. "The science supports this shift, the ethics demand it, and we will apply this standard consistently across the department."

The agency also will look to "potentially replace reliance on human embryonic stem cells," according to Bhattacharya.

Embryonic stem cell lines are lab-grown cell lines used in research that come from aborted human fetal tissue.

Father Tadeusz Pacholczyk, a neuroscientist and senior ethicist at the National Catholic Bioethics Center, called the move "a very welcome development."

"Biomedical research should not be built on the backs of directly-aborted human fetuses or embryos, and taking their bodily tissues for research necessarily involves a failure to obtain valid informed consent, a key ethical principle guiding all modern bioresearch," Pacholczyk told EWTN News.

Pacholczyk welcomed the NIH "taking steps to rein in past abuses involving aborted fetal tissue and NIH funding."

"Several previous U.S. administrations dropped the ethical ball when it came to allowing human fetal tissues from elective abortions to be used in NIH-funded scientific investigations," he said. "In effect, they set up a situation where fetal-tissue research faced very few practical barriers or limitations."

Funding control is "a critical mechanism to avoid unethical research practices," Pacholczyk noted.

"The granting of funding, especially federal funding, is one of the highest forms of approbation and blessing a researcher can obtain in terms of his or her particular line of work," he said. "Disbursement of funding needs to be directly linked to our vision of good, ethical science."

"The rest of the world's scientific community looks to the U.S., and to NIH-funded research in particular, as a kind of model and example when it comes to real excellence in science," Pacholczyk continued. "Such excellence connotes much more than merely developing scientific breakthroughs while ignoring the means used to make those discoveries; it necessarily implies conscientious attention to ethics."

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=291391&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Jan 23, 2026 / 18:54 pm (CNA).

Thousands of pro-lifers attended the  53rd annual March for Life on Friday in Washington, D.C. The 2026 event's theme was "Life Is a Gift," to invite "all people to rediscover the beauty, goodness, and joy of life itself," the March For Life reported.

As attendees marched on the National Mall, they held signs, prayed, and sang their way toward the U.S. Capitol.

Here are some of the best signs that EWTN News spotted at the march.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=291387&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Jan 23, 2026 / 14:23 pm (CNA).

Pro-life speaker Sarah Hurm offered her testimony about facing her fourth unplanned pregnancy at a March for Life rally on the National Mall on Jan. 23.

"I am hear to tell you that abortion pill reversal can work. My life, and the life of my son, is living proof," Hurm, who is a Catholic single mother of four, said at the rally.

Hurm described seeking an abortion. "The clinic had felt lifeless," she said. After taking the abortion pill, she changed her mind and found the abortion pill reversal ministry.

"I realized ... I could fight for my child's life. And so I did," she said.

Abortion pill reversal (APR) is recommended or dispensed by pro-life pregnancy centers to prevent the completion of an abortion shortly after a woman takes mifepristone to achieve a chemical abortion. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) does not recommend the use of APR, citing insufficient evidence. Alternatively, the American Association of Pro-Life OB-GYNs (AAPLOG) states the literature "clearly shows that the blockade is reversible with natural progesterone."

Describing her son's life as "one of the greatest joys," Hurm encouraged participants to be intentional in helping women who are expecting.

"Saving a life can be as simple as answering a phone call, driving a friend to an ultrasound, or helping pick out a car seat," Hurm said. "Small sacrifices can become enormous victories that support moms like me and children like mine. You have that power. Be that person that connects a woman to hope."

Hurm further thanked the men in attendance at the March, saying: "Your voice carries weight, and we need you."

"Join me in making a commitment of being living proof that life is a gift," she concluded.

If you're attending the March for Life, don't forget to use #ewtnprolife on all your posts across X, TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook!

Want to relive interviews and special moments from the march? Visit ewtnnews.com/watch and subscribe to youtube.com/@EWTNNews for full coverage.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=291386&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Jan 23, 2026 / 15:29 pm (CNA).

Vice President JD Vance and Republican lawmakers defended President Donald Trump's abortion-related policies at the 2026 March for Life on Jan. 23.

"You have an ally in the White House," Vance said in his speech.

Vance was the first political speaker at the march, and he was followed by House Speaker Mike Johnson and Rep. Chris Smith, R-New Jersey, the longtime leader of the House pro-life caucus.

Trump and Senate Majority Leader John Thune addressed the marchers in prerecorded video messages.

In his speech, Vance said: "One of the things I most wanted in the United States of America is more families and more babies," and touted the recent announcement that he and his wife, Usha, are expecting their fourth child.

"So let the record show that you have a vice president who practices what he preaches," Vance said.

The vice president said Trump's Supreme Court appointments were vital to overturning Roe v. Wade, which he called "the most important Supreme Court decision of my lifetime."

He said the decision "put a definitive end to the tyranny of judicial rule on the question of human life" and allowed the people to settle these disputes democratically.

Vance spoke about some of the pro-life victories during the first year of Trump's second term.

This included legislation that blocked Planned Parenthood from receiving Medicaid reimbursements as well as reinstating and expanding the Mexico City Policy, which bans federal tax money from being used to support organizations that promote abortion abroad.

The vice president also spoke about the restoration of conscience protections for health care workers, the expansion of the child tax credit, and the pardoning of pro-life activists who were convicted of violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act.

"Building a culture of life requires persuasion," Vance said.

"That effort is going to take a lot of time, it's going to take a lot of energy, and it's going to take a little bit of money," he said.

The vice president briefly addressed some criticism the administration has received from members of the pro-life movement who have been unhappy with certain developments.

Some pro-life advocates have expressed concern about the lack of action on the abortion pill mifepristone, which is under review by the Food and Drug Administration.

Others have raised objections to Trump urging lawmakers to be "flexible" on taxpayer-funded abortions in negotiations about extending Affordable Care Act tax credits.

Vance asked people to look at the successes.

"Look where the fight for life stood just one decade ago and look where it stands today," he said.

In his video message, Trump celebrated many of the same pro-life policies as Vance and thanked marchers for their efforts to "stand up for the unborn."

"We will continue to fight for the eternal truth that every child is a gift from God," Trump said.

Johnson said a shift in policy from the Trump administration is that success is not just measured by the economy but also "the strength of the American family."

He also spoke about the actions taken to ban Planned Parenthood from receiving Medicaid reimbursements, saying: "We finally defunded big abortion and it was a long time coming."

"Every single child deserves the opportunity to fulfill their God-given potential," Johnson said.

Smith referenced the recent Marist Poll commissioned by the Knights of Columbus, which showed most Americans supporting at least some restrictions on abortion and approving of the work of pregnancy resource centers.

He also spoke strongly against the chemical abortion pill mifepristone, which he called "baby poison that kills the unborn child by starving the baby boy or baby girl to death" and said it poses health risks to women.

"We must today recommit to protecting the weakest and most vulnerable," Smith said.

In a video message, Thune called abortion an "evil that's too often brushed to the side."

He said Republicans "will continue to do everything we can in Congress to support moms and protect preborn children."

After the speeches from lawmakers, March for Life President Jennie Bradley Lichter urged participants to contact their senators amid ongoing negotiations related to health care.

Lichter encouraged them to ask their senators to oppose any health care legislation that excludes the Hyde Amendment, which bans taxpayer funding for abortion.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=291379&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Jan 22, 2026 / 18:30 pm (CNA).

The abortion issue will likely be on the ballot in several states this November.

EWTN News took a look at which states have abortion-related measures in the works or on the ballot. 

Four states might vote to create a right to abortion this November. Only one state has a measure to protect life.

Virginian lawmakers add abortion to the ballot

This November, Virginians will consider an amendment to enshrine a fundamental right to abortion in the state constitution. The amendment, if passed, could jeopardize already-existing laws protecting unborn children as well as Virginia's parental notification law.

The proposed abortion amendment would create a "fundamental right to reproductive freedom, including the ability to make and carry out decisions relating to one's own prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, contraception, abortion care, miscarriage management, and fertility care."

Virginia lawmakers approved the amendment for a second time earlier this month, guaranteeing that it will be on the ballot. Virginia Catholic bishops promptly condemned the amendment, saying they "will fight" against its passage.

Virginia protects life after 28 weeks of pregnancy, meaning that abortion is legal until the end of the second trimester and after in cases of serious risk to the woman's health or life.

Nevada looks to confirm abortion amendment

Nevada is close to approving an abortion amendment that would recognize a right to abortion.

The amendment would establish a "fundamental right" to an abortion, "without interference by state or local governments" up to viability, and up to birth for the sake of the health or life of the pregnant mother.

In Nevada, the state constitution can be amended only after two affirmative public votes in consecutive even-year elections. About 64% of Nevadans voted in favor of the amendment in 2024, so a 2026 passage would enshrine the amendment. 

Abortion since the 1990s has been legal until the 24th week of pregnancy in Nevada. In addition to reinforcing pro-abortion laws, the new amendment could block other state laws including the parental notification requirement for minors seeking abortions.

Idaho gathers signatures for abortion ballot measure

In Idaho, a measure to create a right to abortion may appear on the November ballot.

Campaigners are gathering signatures for the measure to legalize abortion until viability, when the baby can survive outside of the womb.

The measure guarantees "a right to make and carry out reproductive decisions, including a right to abortion up to fetus viability."

Idaho law protects unborn children at all stages of pregnancy, with exceptions if the mother's life is at risk.

Oregon measure could reinforce pro-abortion laws

A measure to affirm a right to abortion in Oregon may be on the November ballot.

The measure states that "equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged … on account of sex."

If passed, it would also affirm a right to contraception, in vitro fertilization, medical "gender transition," and same-sex marriage. The measure would repeal a vestigial code in the constitution that defines marriage as between one man and one woman.

Oregon does not protect life at any stage of pregnancy, and the state funds abortion.

Potential ballot measure could repeal Missouri abortion amendment

In November, Missourians will have the opportunity to repeal a 2024 amendment that created a right to abortion in the state constitution. 

If passed, the measure would repeal the state's constitutional right to abortion and allow for laws to regulate abortion. It would also codify parental consent for minors seeking abortion and prohibit gender transition procedures for minors.

The amendment would not protect unborn children younger than 12 weeks in cases of rape or incest. 

Abortion laws have been in flux in Missouri as the 2024 amendment was enforced amid legal challenges.

Blocked from the ballot: Montana's push for personhood 

A Montana measure defining unborn children as persons is not on the ballot this year, despite efforts to pass it.

Despite Montana voters' move to approve a right to abortion in 2024, lawmakers came close to approving the subsequent pro-life measure, which would have stipulated that the word "person" applies "to all members of mankind at any stage of development, beginning at the stage of fertilization or conception, regardless of age, health, level of functioning, or condition of dependency."

The amendment would have required that "no cause of action may arise as a consequence of harm caused to an unborn baby by an unintentional act of its mother."

The measure narrowly failed to pass in both the Montana House of Representatives and the state Senate in early 2025, receiving just less than the two-thirds majority needed for a measure to be added to the Montana ballot.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=291373&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Jan 22, 2026 / 13:30 pm (CNA).

In her first year leading the March for Life, the organization's president is reminding the pro-life movement that they "still have a lot of work to do" in the current political climate, three and a half years after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

"Taking down the Roe regime of abortion-on-demand across the country was incredibly important," Jennie Bradley Lichter, who became president of the March for Life Education and Defense Fund in February 2025, told "EWTN Pro-Life Weekly."

"But there are still way too many abortions happening in this country," she said. "So that's the No. 1 reason why we're still marching."

Tens of thousands of pro-life activists are expected to gather in Washington, D.C., for the 53rd March for Life on Friday, Jan. 23. The march, which drew out about 150,000 people last year, has been held annually since Jan. 22, 1974, one year after Roe v. Wade was decided.

The speakers will include Lichter, U.S. Vice President JD Vance, House Speaker Mike Johnson, and Rep. Chris Smith, among others. President Donald Trump provided a prerecorded message to the marchers, which will be played during the pre-march rally.

Lichter said in the interview that the annual march "accomplishes three really important things for the movement that cannot be accomplished any other way."

The first, she said, is "forming young people for pro-life mission," noting that many attendees are "teenagers and with college students and people in their 20s." Second, she said, it is "also a really important moment of refreshment and being reenergized, and a lot of people have shared that with me this year."

Third, Lichter said, is "the public witness impact of having this many people gathered in the heart of our nation's capital."

"When you stand at the March for Life, you have the Capitol dome behind the stage, and then the Washington Monument behind the marchers," she said. "You are right in the heart of the most powerful and important city in the world, and the city shuts down every year on the day of the March for Life."

"The Lord gives us a chance to show the nation what we're made of, year after year," she added. "It's so powerful."

Political climate

As pro-life advocates gather in Washington, D.C., 30 states and the nation's capital still permit abortion up to the 22nd week or later, with nine states allowing elective abortion through nine months until the moment of birth.

In 13 states, nearly all abortions are illegal and in four states, most abortions are illegal after six weeks' gestation. Two states prohibit abortion after 12 weeks, and one prohibits abortion after 18 weeks.

At the federal level, Lichter expressed some concern stemming from the Trump administration, which was mostly focused on his comment that asked Republicans to be "flexible" on the Hyde Amendment during negotiations about extending health care subsidies related to the Affordable Care Act.

The Hyde Amendment, which prohibits federal tax money from being spent on abortion, has been included in spending bills since 1976, shortly after Roe v. Wade was decided.

"The response to the comment about being flexible on Hyde was swift and strong from everyone," Lichter said, referring to criticism of the comments that came from the pro-life movement.

"The truth is, we're not going to be flexible on Hyde," she said. "We can't be flexible with an issue that implicates human life — the preeminent issue — abortion."

"The Hyde Amendment is Pro-Life 101," Lichter said. "It's a baseline policy that has been in place for 50 years and that every pro-life politician knows is just at the very heart of what it means to be a pro-life lawmaker. So of course, we're not going to be flexible on Hyde."

Lichter noted that some people think abortion "might be a losing issue in the midterms" for Republicans in November, but she believes "that's completely wrong" and "misreads the electorate."

"There's no data, no examples to support the idea that pro-life politicians have been losing elections since [the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade]," she said.

"They just haven't been," she said. "And there's a lot of counter examples, of course, of really strong pro-life politicians who have put life at the center of their work, who have continued to win reelection."

The March for Life rally will be held on the National Mall from 11 a.m. until about 1 p.m., after which attendees will march past the U.S. Capitol and conclude in front of the U.S. Supreme Court building.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=291372&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Jan 22, 2026 / 15:05 pm (CNA).

Legislation supporting pregnant and parenting college students, as well as pro-life pregnancy centers that serve them, is moving through Congress this week as the 2026 March for Life gets underway.

The U.S. House passed legislation that would allow states to use Temporary Assistance for Needy Families and other federal grant funds for pregnancy resource centers. The House passed the measure ( HR 6945) by a vote of 215 to 209 on Jan. 21. A Senate vote is possible next week.

Bill cosponsor Rep. Chris Smith, R-New Jersey, said: "In a pro-abortion culture of denial that dismisses unborn babies and trivializes the harm suffered by women, pregnancy centers affirm the breathtaking miracle of unborn life and the truth that women deserve better than abortion."

Another measure scheduled for legislative action includes a bill ( HR 6359) sponsored by Rep. Ashley Hinson, R-Iowa, that would require U.S. colleges receiving federal student aid to provide students with information about how to choose to carry pregnancies without sacrificing their education.

"This is an opportunity for the GOP to expose Democrats' extremist views on abortion to the American people as well as love them both — mother and preborn child," said Kristan Hawkins, president of Students for Life Action, in a statement.

Newly introduced bills include a measure by Sen. John Kennedy, R-Louisiana, that would make it a crime to transport a minor across state lines to receive an abortion.

"Parents should not be kept in the dark if their kids cross state lines to receive an abortion. I'm proud to help introduce the Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act, which would take important steps to protect vulnerable minors and support parents," Kennedy said in statement Jan. 21.

The bill would protect victims of child abuse as well as human trafficking, Kennedy said.

Sens. Ashley Moody, R-Florida; Bill Cassidy, R-Louisiana; Kevin Cramer, R-North Dakota; Steve Daines, R-Montana; Deb Fischer, R-Nebraska; James Lankford, R-Oklahoma; and Pete Ricketts, R-Nebraska, said they would cosponsor the measure.

A House version ( HR 4964) was introduced by Rep. Dave Taylor, R-Ohio, in August 2025. Taylor welcomed the introduction of the Senate measure and said: "This bill will hold all parties accountable and ensure children are not taken advantage of. As states like California and Illinois promote abortions for all and keep parents in the dark about their child's health, the Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act will put parents back in the equation and protect the lives of both the child and the unborn."

Lankford introduced a bill ( SB 6) on Jan. 15 that would set requirements for health care providers to provide care to babies born alive during botched abortions.

The bill says health care professionals must exercise "the same degree of care as would reasonably be provided to any other children born alive at the same gestational age" and that they must be immediately admitted to a hospital. If a health care professional is found guilty of failing to provide lifesaving care, he or she could face criminal penalties, up to five years in prison, or both under the measure.

"No child should be denied medical care simply because they are 'unwanted.' Today, if an abortion procedure fails and a child is born alive, doctors can just ignore the crying baby on the table and watch them slowly die of neglect. That's not an abortion, that's infanticide," Lankford said in a statement.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=291368&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Jan 22, 2026 / 07:00 am (CNA).

As Bangladesh heads toward a crucial general election on Feb. 12, the country's largest Islamist party, Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami, has offered an unusual assurance to religious minorities, pledging that it would not impose Islamic Sharia law if it comes to power.

Shafiqur Rahman, the leader of Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami, made the promise during a meeting on Jan. 14 with Christian leaders in Dhaka, according to participants in the discussion. The statement has sparked debate across the country, where Jamaat's Islamist ideology and past positions appear to stand in tension with the pledge.

"He promised that they will not run the country under Sharia law," said Martha Das, general secretary of the National Christian Fellowship of Bangladesh, who was part of a 20-member Christian delegation that met Rahman.

She told EWTN News that Christian leaders also raised concerns about the possible introduction of blasphemy laws and the safety and social security of religious minorities.

Rahman assured them that existing laws would remain in place and that no additional legislation targeting religious minorities would be introduced.

Christian leaders described the meeting as an effort to seek clarity and accountability ahead of the election. "We recorded the assurances," Das said, adding that the community intends to hold Jamaat publicly responsible if it reverses its position in the future.

At the same time, Christian leaders stressed that their community does not support Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami. "We never support the Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami party," said one Christian leader who did not want to be named. "But before the election, it is a better opportunity to talk with candidates about safeguards for our future."

Mixed reactions

The statement has generated widespread discussion in Bangladesh, where Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami has long been associated with calls for governance based on Islamic principles. Some analysts see the pledge as a tactical move aimed at broadening the party's appeal among minority voters and the international community, while others argue that Jamaat has shown signs of gradual ideological adjustment in recent years.

A senior Catholic priest in Dhaka, who requested anonymity, cautiously welcomed the statement. "If Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami keeps its word, it is very good," he told EWTN News. "But it remains to be seen whether this is a genuine commitment or a political strategy."

The priest suggested that Jamaat may be attempting to present itself as more moderate to Western countries ahead of the elections. "Developed countries generally view Islamic Sharia negatively," he said. "So Jamaat may be making such statements to gain international acceptance."

Critics, however, point to apparent contradictions between Jamaat's pledge and its broader political record. The party has not nominated any female candidates for the upcoming election, and previous remarks by its leaders about limiting women's working hours have drawn criticism from civil society groups.

Election promises under scrutiny

Political analysts also caution against taking election-time promises at face value. "Sitting with people of different religions and communities before elections is definitely an election move," said Professor Sayeed Ferdous, associate vice chancellor of Bangladesh Open University. "When leaders say we will do this or we will not do that — whether it is Sharia law or minority security — these must be considered election promises."

Ferdous noted that Bangladesh's political history is filled with unfulfilled preelection commitments. "Many parties have made similar promises in the past to attract votes but did not keep them later," he said.

Another analyst, Mahbub Ullah, echoed that view, suggesting Jamaat is trying to soften its image. "They are talking a lot of soft talk ahead of the elections to appear acceptable to everyone," he said. "It is not unusual to adopt such a strategy to change public perception of the party."

Rift within Islamist coalition

The controversy has also exposed divisions within Islamist politics. Earlier this month, the Islamic Movement Bangladesh announced its withdrawal from the 11-party electoral alliance led by Jamaat-e-Islami and declared it would contest 268 seats independently.

At a press briefing in Dhaka on Jan. 16, Islamic Movement spokesperson Gazi Ataur Rahman accused Jamaat of abandoning its ideological roots. "Jamaat has deviated from the Sharia law of Allah for power," he said. "They consider power to be the only important thing."

Rahman added that Jamaat's traditional slogan — "We want the law of Allah, we want the rule of honest people" — has been forgotten, disappointing many grassroots supporters. "We believe it is not possible to establish peace under the existing law of the country," he said. "We want Sharia law."

As Bangladesh approaches election day, Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami's assurances to minorities have raised expectations — and skepticism — about whether political pragmatism or ideological transformation is driving the party's message.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=291367&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Jan 22, 2026 / 08:00 am (CNA).

The president of the Symposium of Episcopal Conferences of Africa and Madagascar (SECAM) has described the first official audience between Pope Leo XIV and the leadership of the Church in Africa as a "very important meeting" that marks a new phase in relations between the African continent and the Holy See.

In an interview with Vatican News following the Jan. 17 audience, Cardinal Fridolin Ambongo explained that although Pope Leo XIV has previously encountered individual African bishops, the audience represented the first formal engagement with the SECAM leadership under the new pontificate. 

The meeting, initially scheduled for Dec. 18, 2025, was postponed due to the pope's apostolic trip to Turkey.

The SECAM delegation included Ambongo and SECAM First Vice President Bishop Stephen Dami Mamza of Nigeria's Diocese of Yola, Archbishop José Manuel Imbamba of the Archdiocese of Saurimo in Angola, who is the second vice president of SECAM, and Father Rafael Simbine, SECAM secretary-general.

"It was really an important meeting," Ambongo said, adding that the audience "was first to establish an official contact with the new pontiff since his election."

He said the audience also provided an opportunity for SECAM leaders to brief the pope on the outcomes of their 2025 Plenary Assembly that was held in Kigali, Rwanda. 

The assembly, which took place just months after Pope Leo XIV's election, focused on the theme "Christ, Source of Hope, Reconciliation, and Peace."

According to Ambongo, the theme was chosen in response to the persistent crises affecting many African nations, particularly in the Great Lakes region.

"Africa is a continent marked by multiple crises. This theme helped us analyze in depth our mission as pastors in a continent characterized by suffering and instability," the Congolese member of the Order of Friars Minor Capuchin said.

Reflecting on the condition of the Church amid Africa's social, political, and security challenges, Ambongo insisted that the Catholic Church remains vibrant and close to the people.

Citing the late Pope Francis' oft-repeated reminder that the Church does not belong to any political camp but stands with the people, he emphasized that African pastors continue to accompany communities enduring hardship and violence.

"The African Church is dynamic, radiant," he said, recalling Pope Benedict XVI's description of Africa as "the spiritual lung of humanity."

At the same time, Ambongo acknowledged that the Church inevitably shares in the suffering of its people, particularly in conflict zones.

The SECAM president also addressed growing anticipation around Pope Leo's expressed intention to make Africa the destination of a future apostolic journey.

Such a visit, he said, would be both pastoral and prophetic, strengthening the faith of Catholics while offering hope to societies weighed down by conflict and poverty.

"When the pope comes to a country in crisis, it is to give hope. His voice comforts the people, confirms them in their commitment, and helps them not to be discouraged," he said.

Ambongo added: "The prophetic word of the universal Shepherd comforts the people, strengthens their commitment, and encourages them not to lose heart. Even if things are going badly today, Christian hope tells us to hold on."

According to the cardinal, the Holy Father also helps guide people toward the pursuit of harmonious coexistence and peace, especially in African countries experiencing crises.

Weighing in on the situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where he serves as bishop of the Kinshasa Archdiocese, Ambongo lamented the ongoing conflict in the eastern part of the country and its devastating impact on ordinary citizens.

He criticized the heavy investment in war and armament, saying such resources could instead be used for education, health care, and development.

"For more than a year now, the Church has been advocating dialogue. No solution will come from weapons but from sitting around a table where everyone can express their concerns," the prelate explained.

He cited ongoing initiatives such as the Washington and Doha processes, which are steps in the right direction but remain insufficient.

The cardinal underscored the need for inclusive dialogue among the government, the opposition (armed and unarmed), and civil society in order to create the conditions for lasting peace and to bring an end to the suffering of the Congolese people.

This story was first published by ACI Africa, the sister service of EWTN News in Africa. It has been adapted by EWTN News English.

Full Article