The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops is urging the U.S. Supreme Court to require 12-person juries in criminal cases, with the bishops arguing against a Florida policy allowing smaller six-person juries in many cases.
The case Kian v. Florida, which the Supreme Court agreed to hear in June, was brought after Florida chiropractor Hamed Kian was convicted of five felony counts for practicing without a license.
Kian was found guilty by a six-person jury; the state of Florida only requires 12-person juries in capital cases. Several other states have similar rules.
Kian sued the state arguing that the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees a right to a 12-person jury. He lost his appeal at the Fourth District Court of Appeal of Florida and subsequently appealed directly to the Supreme Court, which will hold arguments in the case in its upcoming term.
In their amicus filing, the U.S. bishops argued that the term "jury" in the U.S. has historically referenced a body of 12 jurors; the bishops pointed to "Founding-era dictionaries" as well as "common-law history."
The bishops said they have a "strong interest" in the case, insofar as the Catholic Church over the centuries has played a "central role in shaping the legal culture from which the common-law jury emerged."
Among the historical examples of 12-person juries the bishops cited include the General Fundamentals of Plymouth, "the earliest codified legal system by English colonists in North America," which guaranteed that "all trials" would be "tried by a jury of twelve good and lawful men."
The prelates disputed the Supreme Court's 1970 ruling in the case Williams v. Florida, which held that the Sixth Amendment does not require 12 jurors in court cases.
That ruling in part "discard[ed] the robust common-law history of the jury right," while the high court in that decision "set far too high a bar for historical relevance," they said.
The bishops further cited the biblical commandment to "love your neighbor justly." They pointed to the Catholic catechism's mandate for public authorities to "dispense justice humanely by respecting the rights of everyone."
They urged the Supreme Court to "return to its previously long-held understanding that the Constitution entitles criminal defendants to a jury of twelve of their peers."
Numerous advocacy groups have also filed amicus briefs advocating the 12-juror standard, including the American Civil Liberties Union, the Innocence Project, several dozen current and former prosecutors, and the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
