Catholic News

http://www.myspiritfm.com/news?blogid=catholic-news&view=post&articleid=287441&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

CNA Staff, Aug 8, 2025 / 13:08 pm (CNA).

The University of Nebraska has officially apologized for sanctioning a profane "drag" performance that mocked the Catholic Mass earlier this year, with the school undertaking an investigation into the incident after Catholic outcry against it. 

Bishop James Conley of Lincoln, Nebraska, publicly criticized the so-called "drag Mass" in June, calling it "a blatant public display of faith-based discrimination."  

The event was put on in April by music doctoral student Joseph Willette, who claimed the performance was meant to "bridge the gap between queerness and spirituality."

The demonstration "imitated various parts of the Mass, including the Kyrie, Gloria, Credo, Sanctus, and Agnus Dei."

On Aug. 8 the bishop said in a public statement that he had met with University of Nebraska President Jeffrey Gold and other leaders of the university after the incident. The university told the prelate that an "investigation into the matter was already underway."

Conley wrote that University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Chancellor Rodney Bennett subsequently sent a follow-up letter in which the administrator told the bishop: "We regret deeply that the matter we met to discuss has caused disruption, and we sincerely apologize."

The university will "fully embrace the opportunity this incident has prompted to consider carefully how we educate members of our community about the impact individual acts may have on people and communities — both positively and negatively, and whether intended or inadvertent," Bennett wrote, according to Conley.

In his Aug. 8 letter Conley said the school was also establishing a university advisory group meant to reduce the likelihood of such incidents occurring in the future. 

It is unclear if the university has concluded its investigation into the event or if the inquiry is still ongoing. The school did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Aug. 8. 

The school's President's Advisory Roundtable on Community Engagement will help advise the school on "addressing sensitive and often emotional matters for which there are strong convictions."

Representatives from the local Catholic community will be included on the panel, Conley said. 

In addition to backlash from the bishop's office, state lawmakers also reportedly criticized the performance. 

Nebraska Sen. Dan Lonowski told the higher education news website the College Fix that he and a dozen colleagues wrote to the university condemning the display. 

Lonowski, a Catholic, told the Fix that the performance "[did] not appear to advance music nor faith in any manner." Lonowski said the university confirmed that it was undertaking an investigation.

Conley, meanwhile, expressed hope that the school was apologizing not just for the controversy surrounding the incident but "for the substance of the incident itself."

"On behalf of Catholics and all people of faith, I would like to see a more concrete commitment from the university to provide training and education on why this behavior is offensive to Catholics," the bishop wrote. 

Mocking the Eucharist, Conley said, "should never be an action that is rewarded with a degree, but instead should be condemned for its ignorance and evil."

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/news?blogid=catholic-news&view=post&articleid=287435&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

ACI Prensa Staff, Aug 8, 2025 / 07:00 am (CNA).

According to Father Francisco Javier Calvo, Pope Leo XIV's recent announcement that St. John Henry Newman will be declared a doctor of the Church represents "enormous hope," because his figure is called to "illuminate the paths of the Church in the 21st century."

Calvo is a member of the research committee of the John Henry Newman Chair at the Catholic University of Ávila in Spain.

The expert told ACI Prensa, CNA's Spanish-language news partner, that it is no coincidence that Pope Leo XIV decided to name him a doctor of the Church, since St. Augustine was the prime source of the English saint's theology.

"It is very significant that he is the first doctor of the Church proclaimed during his pontificate. As an Augustinian, Leo XIV recognized in Newman one of his own. Both share a spirituality centered on an interior encounter with God, on conscience as the place of dialogue with the Lord," he explained.

St. John Henry Newman, Calvo noted, was a great scholar of the Church Fathers, especially St. Augustine.

In fact, the best-known aspect of Newman's theological and philosophical work is his commitment to a "moral and upright conscience, which he defines as the natural sphere of encounter with the voice of God and is one of the central themes of his theology."

"This connects deeply with the Augustinian tradition, from the "Confessions" to the "Soliloquies," he noted.

Calvo also lauded Newman as a man "of profound truth and profound faith," whose conversion to Catholicism in 1845 was the result of a journey marked by docility in the light of the Holy Spirit.

"Everything he did in his life — including his journey of conversion — he lived with absolute moral integrity. He himself said that he asked the Lord not for light for his entire life but for the next step, and the strength to take it," the priest emphasized.

This attitude of constant discernment, Calvo added, is particularly inspiring in a time like the present, where there is an urgent need to recover a spirituality guided by listening to God and not by one's personal pet projects. 

After his conversion he was viewed by Catholics as an 'infiltrator'

Following his conversion, St. John Henry Newman faced both misunderstandings from the Anglican world and misgivings in the Catholic world, where he was even seen as an "infiltrator" or "a kind of Trojan horse." Despite this, "Pope Leo XIII dispelled those suspicions by appointing him a cardinal," Calvo explained.

One of Newman's greatest legacies was his firm commitment to the formation of the laity. As rector of the Catholic University of Ireland in Dublin, he promoted not only the training of good professionals but, above all, of "good Christians who would bear witness to their faith in their environment," the expert explained. This vision, which seems obvious today after the Second Vatican Council, was profoundly innovative at the time.

Newman was also ahead of his time and had to face the challenge of responding to rationalist schools of thought and English empiricism, represented by figures such as Hume and Locke. "He knew how to respond from a deeply reasoned faith, taking up the philosophical presuppositions of modernity, but rooted in Augustinian spirituality," Calvo emphasized.

But beyond his intellectual brilliance, Newman was, above all, a witness to holiness. "Being a Christian is a personal encounter with Christ that transforms one's entire life. Newman understood it that way, drawing inspiration from the radical commitment of the early Christians, the witness of the martyrs, and the example of the saints," he noted.

In this regard, Calvo recalled Newman's motto, "Cor ad cor loquitur" ("Heart speaks to heart"), and said: "Faith is transmitted from person to person, through the attractiveness of a person's life. It is not treatises but witnesses that evangelize."

Newman's proclamation as a doctor of the Church not only recognizes his holiness but also proposes his thought as a sure guide for believers today.

"We learn from his life, but also from his writings," Calvo noted. "His intellectual journey, his theological and philosophical discernment, are a clear light for Christians to grow in their faith in this complex world, which so desperately needs authentic teachers and true saints."

This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA's Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/news?blogid=catholic-news&view=post&articleid=287434&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

National Catholic Register, Aug 8, 2025 / 10:00 am (CNA).

A Massachusetts mayor is going to bat for including statues of two Catholic saints on the city's new public safety building, saying he picked them because of their importance to police and firefighters and accusing opponents of harboring "'negative attitudes' toward Catholicism."

But lawyers for local residents who object to the planned 10-foot-high bronze statues of St. Michael and St. Florian say the mayor is making non-Catholics "feel like second-class citizens" because of the statues, which they say violates the Massachusetts Constitution by favoring one religion over another.

The two sides exchanged pointed arguments in court papers filed recently in a state lawsuit brought earlier this year by the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts and Americans United for the Separation of Church and State.

Thomas Koch, a practicing Catholic and the mayor of Quincy, a city of about 100,000 just south of Boston, wants to install on the façade of a forthcoming $175-million, 120,000-square-foot public safety building statues of St. Michael the Archangel (the patron saint of police officers) and St. Florian (the patron saint of firefighters). The statues are expected to cost about $850,000.

"I selected the statutes of Michael and Florian for installation on the public safety building due to their status as symbols in police and fire communities worldwide. The selection had nothing to do with Catholic sainthood but rather with an effort to boost morale and to symbolize the values of truth, justice, and the prevalence of good over evil," Koch said in an affidavit filed last month.

"If Michael and Florian did not have significance in the police and fire service, respectively, I would not have selected them for installation," the mayor added.

The mayor is asking a judge to dismiss the lawsuit, which was filed May 27 in Norfolk County Superior Court in Dedham.

But lawyers for the plaintiffs, who are 15 residents of Quincy who object to the mayor's plan, described the statues earlier this week as "icons with unmistakable religious significance," noting: "Saints in general, and patron saints specifically, are prominent within certain sects of Christianity, especially Catholicism."

An "objective observer," the plaintiffs' lawyers argued, would see the statues as "permanent installations that will invoke and convey, on an ongoing basis, the city's preference for Catholic religious doctrine."

"The primary effect of the statues will be to advance religion over non-religion, and Catholicism over other Christian and non-Christian sects and denominations," a motion filed Aug. 4 states.

The plaintiffs are seeking an injunction from the state Superior Court judge preventing the city from installing the statues when the public safety building opens, which is scheduled for October.

A court conference in the case has been scheduled for Aug. 12.

A question of Massachusetts law

The legal wrangling is over the Massachusetts Constitution, not the U.S. Constitution. Residents who object to the statues have appealed primarily to state law.

During colonial times and in the early decades of independence, the Massachusetts government favored the Congregational Church over other denominations, forcing property owners to support their local Congregationalist minister with their property taxes whether they belonged to the church or not.

In 1833, the state disestablished the Congregational Church, declaring in an amendment to the state constitution approved by a state constitutional convention that "no subordination of any one sect or denomination to another shall ever be established by law."

On occasion, disputes over that language make it to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, as the Quincy statues' case might.

In 1979, the state's highest court upheld the ability of both the state Senate and state House of Representatives to hire and pay a part-time chaplain for each chamber — both of whom at the time happened to be Catholic priests — in a case called Colo v. Treasurer & Receiver General. 

In that same case, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court adopted for the state the so-called Lemon test after a 1971 case in which the U.S. Supreme Court stated three standards for determining whether a law that affects religious entities passes constitutional muster: whether it has "a secular legislative purpose," whether "its principal or primary effect … neither advances or inhibits religion," and whether it fosters "excessive entanglement between government and religion."

In June 2022, after years of expressing skepticism about the Lemon test, the U.S. Supreme Court formally disavowed it in a case involving prayers offered by a high school football coach in Washington state called Kennedy v. Bremerton School District.

In the Quincy statues case, the city solicitor, James Timmins, argued in court papers filed July 30 that since the U.S. Supreme Court has disavowed the Lemon test, "that test can no longer govern in Massachusetts, either."

But the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, which is the ultimate interpreter of the state constitution, hasn't heard a case on that point since then.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs in Quincy argue in court papers that since the state's highest court hasn't walked away from the Lemon test, then lower state courts must apply it — plus a fourth standard the state Supreme Judicial Court added in the 1979 Colo case: whether a "challenged practice" has "divisive political potential."

Under those criteria, the plaintiffs' lawyers argue, the state Superior Court judge must deny the city's motion to dismiss and issue an injunction preventing the statues from being installed.

However the Superior Court judge rules, if the Quincy case makes the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on appeal, it will provide the justices a chance to revisit the Lemon test, including how the state constitution applies to disputes involving religion.

This story was first published by the National Catholic Register, CNA's sister news partner, and has been adapted by CNA.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/news?blogid=catholic-news&view=post&articleid=287426&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Aug 7, 2025 / 14:33 pm (CNA).

As officials carry out mass deportations across the United States, Bishop Mark Brennan of Wheeling-Charleston, West Virginia, is criticizing the Trump administration's policy of deporting "as many immigrants as possible" without "distinguishing between true criminals and law-abiding persons."

In a recent statement addressing Catholics in his diocese, Brennan said "some of you have told me that you were happy to support a presidential candidate who would install order at the southern border and keep out drug traffickers, terrorists, and violent criminals but that you didn't expect this wholesale assault on the majority of immigrants, who work hard, are raising their families, and live peacefully in our communities."

The bishop urged the government to prioritize deporting violent criminals rather than upstanding people, highlighting that entering the U.S. "without official government permission is a misdemeanor, a crime but a lesser one, on the level with loitering, public intoxication, and shoplifting."

Brennan's critique of mass deportations aligns with a number of other Catholic leaders including Los Angeles Archbishop José Gómez, who recently said: "A great nation can take the time and care to make distinctions and judge each case on its merits."

"On our journey to eternity, the Lord expects us to help one another," Brennan said. "Why else would he command us: Love your neighbor as yourself and do unto others as you would have them do unto you?"

"In the light of these Christian principles, we the people must act," Brennan declared. For example, Catholics can call for "less cruel" enforcement and can speak up "when we hear grossly inaccurate talk about undocumented immigrants being uniformly criminal, when only a few commit violent crimes."

"As people of faith, we should pray intensely for God to touch the minds and hearts of our political leaders and move them to be more reasonable and humane in their policies; and for those who implement those policies to do so with respect for their fellow human beings."

Brennan encouraged those enforcing immigration policies "to consider whether a specific action is morally justified," because ultimately, "the final judge of our actions is God."

Speaking of law enforcement officers, he said: "I recognize that they have sworn to uphold the law. Yet the manner in which a law is enforced matters. Those acting on the government's behalf cannot escape personal responsibility for an unjust action with the excuse that it was ordered by their superiors."

"That defense was not allowed during the Nuremberg trials of Nazi war criminals at the end of World War II," Brennan explained. "The judges held that a soldier, guard, or official who authorized or engaged in gross violations of human rights was personally responsible for his acts."

With that said, Brennan clarified: "What has been reported about excesses in immigration enforcement does not approach the horror of Nazi treatment of prisoners, but the principle of personal responsibility for one's actions remains the same."

"Our Church would have no martyrs if the highest good was to preserve one's life. Some things are worth taking a principled stand for," Brennan said. In tandem with bishops across the nation, Brennan called on Catholics "to affirm the humanity of all immigrants, regardless of legal status."

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/news?blogid=catholic-news&view=post&articleid=287422&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

CNA Newsroom, Aug 7, 2025 / 09:53 am (CNA).

Marine Rosset, the newly appointed president of France's largest Catholic-inspired scouting organization, resigned less than two months after her election amid intense criticism over her support for abortion rights and her homosexual relationship.

After announcing her resignation on Aug. 6, the 39-year-old Socialist Party member explained her decision in an interview with the Catholic daily La Croix, saying the "situation had become untenable" and expressing her desire to "protect the movement."

Rosset was elected president of the Scouts et Guides de France (SGDF) on June 14 by a decisive vote of 22 to 2, with one abstention.

The SGDF is France's largest scouting association with over 100,000 members. The association was formed in 2004 through the merger of two historically Catholic organizations.

Today, the group maintains Catholic chaplains and describes itself as both "a Catholic youth and popular education movement" and as "open to all, without distinction of nationality, culture, social origin, or belief."

Controversial positions spark criticism

The controversy centered on Rosset's public positions that directly conflict with Catholic teaching. A Paris city councilor and former schoolteacher of history and geography, Rosset is in a same-sex civil union and has a child through artificial reproduction. 

The Socialist Party member has also publicly advocated for abortion rights, positions that drew sharp criticism from Catholic media and clergy.

"After my election, there were people outside of scouting — political forces, communications networks, even financial ones — who instrumentalized positions I had taken," Rosset told La Croix. "This created a false image of the Scouts and Guides de France, because a number of my positions became associated with those of the movement."

According to Le Monde, some chaplains within the scouting movement had expressed opposition to her appointment, citing concerns about both her political activism and personal life that contradict Church teaching on sexuality and life issues.

Catholic website Tribune Chrétienne called her resignation "the end of an organized misunderstanding," arguing that one cannot lead a Catholic youth movement while "openly contradicting what the Church teaches as nonnegotiable."

Political complications compound controversy

Political factors also contributed to Rosset's decision. With a by-election scheduled in her Paris constituency this fall, she had planned to campaign for her party's candidate. This move would have further politicized the scouting group and potentially alienated Catholic families, according to Le Monde.

"Any statement I made would have been scrutinized," Rosset explained to La Croix. "It was really important to me that the movement not be reduced to my person alone — it is bigger than me."

The official SGDF statement claimed "violent, discriminatory, and dehumanizing remarks" had been directed at Rosset and that she had filed legal complaints over online threats.

Pierre Monéger, the organization's former vice president, has assumed leadership through a collective governance structure that includes two new vice presidents, Julie Lefort and Charles Le Gac.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/news?blogid=catholic-news&view=post&articleid=287410&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

CNA Staff, Aug 6, 2025 / 14:55 pm (CNA).

A state appeals court in Texas this week affirmed that Attorney General Ken Paxton will not be permitted to question the leaders of a Catholic Charities affiliate at the U.S.-Mexico border amid an inquiry into illegal immigration.

The state 15th Court of Appeals said in an Aug. 4 ruling that Catholic Charities of the Rio Grande Valley has cooperated sufficiently with the state's investigation into the charity. Paxton's office has been conducting broad inquiries into allegations that nonprofits have facilitated illegal immigration in the state.

Prosecutors were not entitled to a "pre-suit deposition" from charity leaders, including its executive director, Sister Norma Pimentel, the court ruled.

Rather than "an uncooperative or evasive organization," the Catholic charity has been "responsive to [Paxton's] requests," up to and including extensive documentation and a sworn testimony from Pimentel, the appeals court said. 

Those responses "may not have provided all of the information or the narrative responses" sought by the attorney general's office, the court said. But they "addressed the lion's share of the issues" the state was investigating and allowed the attorney general's office to decide whether or not to file an official lawsuit.

The prosecutor's office was required to prove that "the benefits of forcing a pre-suit deposition outweigh the burdens to Catholic Charities." But the charity's high level of cooperation with the government meant Paxton's office could not justify the deposition.

A representative with Catholic Charities of the Rio Grande Valley did not immediately respond to a query on the ruling on Wednesday morning.

Following the lower court's ruling last year, Pimentel said in a statement that the charity hoped to "put this behind us and focus our efforts on protecting and upholding the sanctity and dignity of all human lives while following the law."

Paxton has challenged several Catholic organizations in the state in recent months, including Annunciation House in El Paso, which he attempted to shut down for allegedly facilitating "illegal border crossings."

Earlier this year that charity, which operates a shelter network for "migrant, refugee, and economically vulnerable peoples," argued in the state Supreme Court that though it does offer housing to immigrants in the country illegally, it is "not concealing anyone [or] hiding anyone from detection from law enforcement."

First Liberty Institute, which advocates religious freedom, also filed a brief against a forced closure of Annunciation House, arguing that the Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act protects the charity against "outright closure."

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/news?blogid=catholic-news&view=post&articleid=287397&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Vatican City, Aug 5, 2025 / 14:16 pm (CNA).

Pope Leo XIV made a surprise visit to Ignacio Gonzálvez, a 15-year-old Spanish boy who had been urgently admitted to Bambino Gesù Hospital in Rome after collapsing during the Jubilee of Youth.

Upon learning of Ignacio's situation, Pope Leo XIV asked the thousands of young people gathered for the Aug. 2 vigil at Tor Vergata to join in prayer for him.

"I would like to ask for your prayers for another friend, a young Spaniard, Ignacio Gonzálvez, who has been admitted to the Bambino Gesù Hospital. Let us pray for him, for his health," the visibly moved pontiff said.

Ignacio's parents, Pedro Pablo and Carmen Gloria, along with his siblings Pedro Pablo Jr. and Adela, traveled to Rome immediately upon receiving the news.

On the afternoon of Monday, Aug. 4, according to the Holy See, Pope Leo XIV personally visited Ignacio in his room in the intensive care unit. The young pilgrim has been diagnosed with lymphoma affecting his respiratory tract.

As reported by Vatican News, the Holy Father entered silently as the young man's family prayed at the foot of his bed and simply joined them in prayer. The family had their eyes closed at the time, and a priest accompanying them had to nudge them when he saw the pontiff cross the threshold unannounced.

The youth's sister, Adela, 17, described Pope Leo XIV as "a simple man" and said the Holy Father was with them for about half an hour before visiting other patients in the hospital's oncology ward. "I was crying and praying when he entered Ignacio's room. I went in crying and came out laughing," she said.

During the time spent with Ignacio's family, Pope Leo XIV reminded them that "we are made for heaven." Pedro Pablo, the young man's father, said they all found solace after the pontiff's visit.

"He told us that the important thing is to do God's will, that our true place is eternal life in heaven. This comforted us, because we are people who try to live our faith and know that's the truth. And in times of so much suffering, hearing the pope come and give you such a word is ... the best thing that could have happened to us," he told Vatican News.

His mother, Carmen Gloria, shared that Pope Leo told her: "If Ignatius had come to Rome [from Spain], that he could come to the hospital to see him. They were simple words, but full of affection."

"The pope told us that this is a mystery and that, despite many things we don't understand, we know that God is there and wants the best for everyone. As a mother, I saw that Jesus Christ drew close to me and said, 'You're not alone.' That's what the pope's presence in the hospital meant to me, the confirmation that God has not abandoned us," she added with emotion.

Ignacio's family said they find comfort and hope despite their pain and are grateful for the gestures of closeness. "It's the work of the Holy Spirit. We are nothing, a family like many others... And to see so many people praying, so many people concerned, and that the pope himself should come, is a great consolation. We know that God is with us," Carmen Gloria said.

Ignacio's brother, Pedro Pablo Jr., emphasized that the pope had helped them accept God's will: "He listened to us at all times, he was truly concerned, he gave me the feeling of someone who truly understood the situation and the pain we are experiencing. [He has] great empathy."

This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA's Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/news?blogid=catholic-news&view=post&articleid=287390&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Aug 5, 2025 / 06:00 am (CNA).

President Donald Trump's administration may be walking back an earlier plan that would have required insurance companies to provide coverage for in vitro fertilization (IVF), according to a report from the Washington Post.

The Post reported that "two people with knowledge of internal discussions" told the outlet that the White House does not plan to impose any IVF mandates on health insurance providers.

According to the report, a senior administration official said expanding IVF access is still "a huge priority" for the president but that any government-imposed mandatory coverage would need to come from legislation passed through Congress. The article reported that such a plan is not on the table at the moment.

CNA reached out to the White House for a response to that report and to ask whether religious liberty concerns for Catholics and others opposed to IVF are being weighed in the deliberations but did not get a response by the time of publication.

The Catholic Church opposes IVF because it separates the creation of life from the marital act and because the process results in the destruction of millions of human embryos, which ends human lives. The Southern Baptist Convention officially expressed opposition to IVF last year as well, but many Protestant denominations do not take a formal stance.

Trump first promised nearly a year ago during a campaign rally that the government would either subsidize IVF costs with taxpayer money or impose a coverage mandate on insurers. In October, Trump told EWTN's Raymond Arroyo that a religious exemption for those opposed to IVF "sounds to me like a pretty good idea" and that "we will look at that."

As president in February, Trump signed an executive order directing the United States Domestic Policy Council to examine ways to expand IVF access, which sparked immediate concerns from the pro-life community and the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). At this point, the administration has not imposed any rules related to IVF coverage.

Father Thomas Ferguson, who serves on the religious leadership advisory board for Trump's Religious Liberty Commission, told CNA the report suggesting a departure from an insurance coverage mandate is "welcome news" but that Catholics "must continue to remain vigilant" in opposition to IVF.

IVF, Ferguson said, is "an illicit medical procedure" and must not be portrayed as an "essential health benefit."

"It is a matter of grave concern that there might exist the possibility that tax dollars would be used to pay for IVF procedures under federally funded insurance plans," Ferguson said.

"An even more serious concern would be the prospect of the federal government attempting to mandate privately funded insurance plans to pay for IVF services in a manner that would be clearly contrary to the religious beliefs of individuals, business owners, or even churches themselves," he added.

The Religious Liberty Commission has held one hearing so far, but concerns about potential IVF expansion were not on the agenda. Ferguson said that education will be the focus of the second hearing scheduled for Sept. 8. No other topics have been scheduled yet, but he said he expects Catholic leaders to raise the IVF issue within the context of the commission's work.

"Catholic belief and teaching that IVF is a morally illicit means of conceiving human life is well known, so it should be no surprise that Catholic leaders and the Catholic faithful would be dismayed by the administration's commitment to promote IVF as a part of its policy on marriage and family life," Ferguson added.

Father Tadeusz Pacholczyk, a senior ethicist at the National Catholic Bioethics Center (NCBC), expressed optimism about the report, telling CNA that Trump's advisers "thankfully seem to have gotten his ear and reminded him that the government ought not be subsidizing IVF in any manner."

IVF, he said, is "an unethical approach to satisfying parental desires and customer yearnings by erecting and subsidizing an enormous industry to replace what parents themselves are meant to do uniquely within the marital embrace. Human life is not respected in the process but is instead commodified and objectified."

Rather than covering IVF, Pacholczyk said health insurance should cover "authentic therapies and treatments for infertility," such as natural procreative technology and Fertility Education and Medical Management, which are pro-life alternatives that seek to address the root causes of fertility struggles.

NCBC past president and senior fellow Joseph Meaney told CNA the report is "highly welcome news" and noted that IVF is "extremely unethical and costly," while the many pro-life alternatives are "ethically and financially" preferable.

He said the Church has consistently condemned IVF as immoral since 1987 in the document Donum Vitae and that the First Amendment would require that any potential insurance mandate have religious liberty exemptions.

"Religious freedom constitutional guarantees in the U.S. would make it illegal to impose IVF on Catholics and particularly on Catholic employers who might have been required to pay for IVF through their employee health insurance plans," Meaney added.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/news?blogid=catholic-news&view=post&articleid=287389&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

ACI Prensa Staff, Aug 5, 2025 / 07:00 am (CNA).

A Spanish court has ruled in favor of the Catholic Church in the eviction lawsuit against the former Poor Clare nuns of Belorado, ordering them to leave the monastery they are illegally occupying.

"The ruling upholds in its entirety the eviction lawsuit filed on Sept. 16, 2024, by the pontifical commissioner as major superior, administrator, and legal representative of the monastery of Belorado," announced the statement from the office of the pontifical commissioner published Aug. 1.

The papal commissioner, Archbishop Mario Iceta, is also the archbishop of Burgos, where the monastery is located.

The text specifies that the ruling declares "that the eviction of the defendant [the schismatic former nuns] from the aforementioned property is warranted, the possession of which must be returned to the plaintiff, and orders the defendant to vacate, leave the aforementioned property free and clear, and at the disposal of the plaintiff, with the threat of eviction if they do not do so voluntarily."

The ruling of the lower court, located in the town of Briviesca, follows the July 29 trial and states that "the defendant has not demonstrated, as was their responsibility, that it possesses any title that would justify and legitimize the use of the property" against the demand to vacate by the actual title holder, "which must lead to the full upholding of the claim."

The ruling also emphasizes that the schismatic former nuns cannot acquire the property they occupy because it is merely "a gathering of individuals [as opposed to a juridical person] lacking the authority" to do so.

Carlos Azcona of the office of the pontifical commissioner said regarding the case that "it is important to note that this ruling addresses the substance of the matter," stating that the former nuns' "so-called conventual chapter" is nothing more than "a gathering of individuals lacking the authority to meet as such a chapter."

He thus noted that "the agreement reached [by the schismatic nuns] regarding the transformation of the monastery into a civil association would be null and void and cannot serve as a justification for the right to continue occupying the monastery."

Finally, Azcona clarified that "the ruling we learned of yesterday orders the eviction of the schismatic former nuns who do not belong to the monastic community. The older sisters [still in communion with Rome] are the only ones who constitute the Belorado monastic community, and at this time we should not make any statements regarding any action related to them."

In a previous ruling, the Briviesca court had already set Sept. 12 as the date for the eviction.

The schismatic former nuns of Belorado

The former Poor Clare nuns of Belorado were excommunicated from the Catholic Church for the crime of schism in June 2024 after announcing in May 2024 that they were leaving the Catholic Church and placing themselves under the tutelage of a false excommunicated bishop.

On May 13, when they announced their departure from the Catholic Church, the nuns indicated in a letter and a declaration that they recognize "H.H. Pius XII as the last valid supreme pontiff," a decision that was explained through an attached 70-page text titled "Catholic Manifesto" claiming that "the see of St. Peter is vacant and usurped." 

At the time, the nuns stated that their community "is leaving the conciliar Church to which it belonged to become part of the Catholic Church." They complained that in recent years there have been "contradictions, double and confusing language, ambiguity, and loopholes in clear doctrine have been coming from the chair of Peter." 

In addition to the penalty of excommunication, the 10 former nuns were expelled from consecrated life, which meant they were supposed to leave the monastery. However, they did not do so and began a legal battle to remain in the building.

In mid-September 2024, Iceta, the pontifical commissioner appointed by Pope Francis, filed a lawsuit demanding that the schismatic former nuns leave the monastery. He had repeatedly stated that the former Poor Clares could no longer occupy the monastery, having expressed their decision not to remain in the Catholic Church.

This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA's Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/news?blogid=catholic-news&view=post&articleid=287383&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

ACI Prensa Staff, Aug 4, 2025 / 18:02 pm (CNA).

In a new gesture of closeness to the victims of irregular migration, Pope Leo XIV expressed his "profound sorrow" for the sinking of a boat off the coast of Yemen in which at least 76 migrants on their way to Saudi Arabia died. Most of the passengers were Ethiopian nationals.

In a telegram signed by Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the pontiff entrusted "the many migrants who have lost their lives to the loving mercy of Almighty God."

In the message, addressed to the apostolic nuncio in Yemen, Archbishop Christophe Zakhia El-Kassis, the pope also invoked "divine strength, consolation, and hope for the survivors, emergency workers, and all those affected by this tragedy."

The tragedy occurred on the dangerous route through the Gulf of Aden, also known as "the route of death." According to the International Organization for Migration (IOM), this route is one of the deadliest crossings in the world, used by traffickers to transport migrants to Gulf countries, particularly Saudi Arabia, in search of job opportunities.

Despite the extreme conditions and the armed conflict that has ravaged Yemen — the poorest country in the Arabian Peninsula — for more than a decade, thousands of people, especially from Ethiopia and Somalia, continue to risk their lives along this route. The IOM estimates that 157 people were traveling on the boat that sank on Aug. 3, of whom 76 were found dead, 32 survived, and dozens remain missing.

In 2024 alone, the IOM recorded at least 558 deaths on the route between Djibouti in East Africa and Yemen. However, many tragedies go unreported due to a lack of control and monitoring in conflict zones. In addition to shipwrecks, migrants face exploitation, sexual violence, forced labor, and torture, often at the hands of criminal networks.

This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA's Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA.

Full Article