VILNIUS, Lithuania — A planned reorganization and merger of Lithuania's Kaunas Christian Maternity Home (KGN) with its parent hospital have triggered protests from families and pro-life advocates who fear the consolidation will erode the institution's distinctive character and family-focused mission.

KGN is owned by LSMU Kaunas Hospital, which itself is equally divided between two shareholders: the Ministry of Health and the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LSMU), each holding 50% ownership. Both shareholders recently approved an optimization plan that would merge KGN into the larger hospital in an effort to streamline operations and reduce costs linked to obstetrics.
A century of care
Founded in 1926, KGN is the last major maternity home of its kind in Lithuania, focusing on low-risk pregnant mothers. When a report of its family-friendly environment and quality care reached Pope John Paul II in 1997, the impressed pontiff later sent a handwritten greeting blessing the maternity home. To date, it has been consistently rated as one of the best places to give birth in Lithuania.
The maternity home has long partnered with Caritas Lithuania, the Archdiocese of Kaunas, and various pregnancy crisis centers to help mothers give birth in a safe and highly personal environment, which most argue is not the case in typical obstetrics wards in major hospitals.

Critics of the merger say that dismantling KGN, given its rich 100-year history, recognition from the late pope, and excellent record, makes families feel unheard and their needs ignored.
Why families fear the merger
Jarune Rimavice, head of the "Let's Save the Kaunas Maternity Home" initiative, which has gathered over 12,000 signatures, told EWTN News that the merger plans would negatively alter the care mothers receive.
She explained that the infrastructure at LSMU Kaunas Hospital is less family-friendly and that allocating higher flows of pregnant mothers there would result in "less privacy and less individual attention." She also pointed out that "some of the delivery rooms and wards do not have private sanitary facilities, which reduces the feeling of privacy and dignity during childbirth."
Rimavice argued that KGN's defining strength lies not only in its family-oriented facilities but also in a care culture built around emotional safety, close personal attention, and respectful communication between staff and mothers.
She said this approach is a key reason for the maternity home's high satisfaction among families. Such a culture, she warned, "cannot be simply transferred to another environment by administrative decision alone."
For that reason, she said, merging KGN into a larger multi-specialty hospital "is not an equivalent transfer of services — it is a real deterioration of conditions for women in labor."
An appeal to Pope Leo XIV
Reports circulated that organizers of the KGN petition had met with Archbishop Georg Gänswein, the apostolic nuncio to the Baltic states.
When EWTN News approached him for confirmation, Gänswein acknowledged the meeting, saying he received three representatives who outlined the situation surrounding the Kaunas Christian Maternity Home. He added: "On that occasion they gave me a letter for Pope Leo XIV."
Organizers later told EWTN News that the letter was an appeal to the Holy Father, detailing their concerns. Gänswein added that he subsequently spoke with the archbishop of Kaunas, informing him of the meeting while discussing the facts of the matter. "He promised to take care on the matter," he noted.
The Archdiocese of Kaunas later issued a statement supporting the petition while highlighting the long-standing role of maternity homes "whose activities are based on Christian values," in providing both medical and dignity-based care. Kaunas Archbishop Kestutis Kevalas also called for cooperation to find solutions to preserve the maternity home.
Lithuania's current healthcare situation
On May 3, marked as Mother's Day in Lithuania, supporters gathered outside KGN, calling for its preservation while stressing its importance to families. The demonstration reflects a broader rise in visibility of Lithuania's pro-life movement, which included a major pro-life march held last year in Vilnius. It also comes as the government continues to discuss measures aimed at supporting families and addressing the country's declining birth rate.

Against this backdrop, Rimavice highlighted what she described as a clear policy contradiction. "On one hand, the state talks about encouraging birth rates, but on the other hand, it reduces the choices available to mothers and destroys precisely those places that families trust the most and where they feel safe," she said.
Others have also pointed to structural issues in Lithuania's healthcare system. The current funding model reimburses hospitals largely based on the number of deliveries performed, which critics say incentivizes volume over quality. This approach can contribute to staff burnout, lower levels of individual care, and a tendency to favor faster, more intervention-heavy procedures, such as C-section births over natural births. Rimavice stated that "maternity wards already face low pay and heavy workloads," making it difficult to attract and retain staff, and leaving obstetrics systematically undervalued.
Observers have pointed to Germany as a potential model for reform. There, funding changes introduced payments that cover fixed costs regardless of delivery volume, helping maintain service availability and reducing incentives tied to the number of births.
Rimavice said her initiative's goal is to preserve the Kaunas Christian Maternity Home as an independent, family-oriented facility offering a "safe alternative between home birth and hospital inpatient birth." She stressed that the group supports reform, but only if it improves conditions for mothers, including changes to the funding model and more targeted, quality-focused service optimization.



