Catholic News

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=Catholic-News&view=post&articleid=289624&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Nov 4, 2025 / 22:10 pm (CNA).

Pennsylvania voters elected to retain three Democratic justices on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court following a campaign with outside groups casting the vote as a referendum on abortion access, election integrity, and the future balance of the court.

The outcome means Democrats will maintain their 5-2 majority on the court.

With more than 54% of the vote tallied, 62.3% voted to retain Christine Donohue, 62.5% voted to retain Kevin Dougherty, and 62.4% voted to retain David Wecht. None of the other justices were on the ballot for 2025.

The Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee celebrated the victory on X. 

"Thanks to tonight's victories, the court's Democratic majority will continue to protect fair maps, voting rights, and reproductive freedom for Pennsylvanians for years to come," the post read.

In Pennsylvania, state Supreme Court justices are chosen through partisan elections to 10-year terms. When a judge's term expires, voters choose whether to retain them for another 10 years with a "yes" or "no" vote. Only one justice has ever lost a retention vote: Russell Nigro in 2005.

While the 2025 Wisconsin Supreme Court race had over $100 million in total donations and spending, setting a new national record for a state judicial election, the Pennsylvania race totaled a fraction of that, according to the Pennsylvania Department of State. An estimated $15 million poured into the race. Donors included Planned Parenthood and labor unions, among others, plus Jeff Yass, a businessman who is a billionaire and the commonwealth's richest man.

The 2025 campaign for Democratic justices focused heavily on abortion access. 

One campaign advertisement in favor of retaining the three justices detailed the pro-life laws in several other states after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. It called the Democratic justices on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court "our last line of defense" against restrictions on abortion.

Last year, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court revived a 2019 lawsuit filed against the state's Abortion Control Act. The existing law, which the state Supreme Court upheld in 1985, prohibits the use of state funds for abortion except in cases of rape, incest, or when the mother's life is at risk.

In the decision, the majority ruled that banning public funds for most abortions "discriminates against those women who choose to exercise their fundamental right to terminate a pregnancy" and asserted the state constitution's guarantee of equal protection "includes a right to decide whether to have an abortion or to carry a pregnancy to term."

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court sent the case back down to the appellate court, which could set the stage for a major abortion ruling in the state that could open the door to taxpayer-funded elective abortions.

In Pennsylvania, elective abortion is legal through the 23rd week of pregnancy. 

Reproductive Freedom For All also celebrated the wins on X. The organization wrote Donohue's win would protect abortion access "and will help to fight anti-abortion restrictions." It called Wecht's win "a key success for abortion rights in the state." The account wrote Dougherty would "continue to protect abortion access in the Keystone State."

All three justices were endorsed by Planned Parenthood PA PAC and Reproductive Freedom for All.

Other issues that came up during the campaign included redistricting fights and mail-in voting.

Donohue reaches the mandatory retirement age of 75 in 2027. Both Dougherty and Wecht are 63 years old, which means they will not face another retention vote until 2035.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=Catholic-News&view=post&articleid=289623&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

CNA Staff, Nov 4, 2025 / 22:17 pm (CNA).

Off-year elections for state leadership roles in Virginia and New Jersey saw Democrats win key races in what pundits had predicted would be a referendum against Republican President Donald Trump's second term in the White House.

Former U.S. Rep. Abigail Spanberger, D-Virginia, won the gubernatorial race in that state against current Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears to become the commonwealth's first woman governor, according to the Associated Press, while state Sen. Ghazala Hashmi won the race for lieutenant governor there. Democrat Jay Jones also won the state's attorney general race, beating incumbent Jason Miyares.

In New Jersey, meanwhile, Democrat Mikie Sherrill beat Republican Jack Ciattarelli, with Sherrill keeping the governor's chair in Democratic control and becoming the second woman to lead the state government.

The results will likely be hailed as a rebuke against Trump's second term in office, which over the course of 2025 has been marked by aggressive policy on immigration, LGBT issues, and other hot-button political topics.

Virginia race marked by abortion, conscience rights, violent rhetoric 

In Virginia, the race between Spanberger and Earle-Sears was overshadowed in its last month by resurfaced text messages from Jones, dating from 2022, in which he suggested that then-state Speaker of the House Todd Gilbert, a Republican, should be shot in the head. Jones at the time also indicated a wish for Gilbert's children to die. 

The explosive texts, which were published at National Review in October, led Spanberger and Hashmi to condemn Jones, though neither they nor any major Democrats called for Jones to drop out of the race. Jones himself apologized for the remarks. 

Earle-Sears repeatedly called for Jones to back out of the contest. At the election's only gubernatorial debate on Oct. 9, she pressed Spanberger on Jones' texts, demanding that the Democrat call for Jones' withdrawal from the race.

Spanberger, meanwhile, made abortion access a central part of her campaign, calling on voters to elect her in order to protect Virginia's permissive abortion laws. The Democrat has voiced support for a state constitutional amendment protecting abortion, something to which Earle-Sears has publicly voiced her opposition.

The state's Catholic bishops had warned in October that the results of the state's elections could lead to that amendment's being advanced and codified into law, with this year's winners poised to "decide whether the proposed amendments are advanced or stopped."

In August, meanwhile, a resurfaced video from 2018 showed Spanberger apparently endorsing the policy of forcing religious hospitals to opt out of performing procedures such as abortion and euthanasia. 

"I oppose the ability of religious institutions to put their religious-based ideas on individuals and their health care choices and options," she said at the time. 

Earle-Sears has expressed support for conscience rights, meanwhile, and during the October debate she indicated support for allowing employers to fire employees over their sexuality. "That's not discrimination," she said. 

Abortion safe in New Jersey; candidates differ on LGBT issues

In New Jersey, the Republican and Democratic candidates for governor offered a notable agreement on abortion, with both Sherrill and Ciattarelli stating their desire to keep the procedure legal.

The two differed on specific policy: Ciattarelli had advocated restricting abortion after 20 weeks, while Sherrill said she favored the state's current laws, which allow for abortion up until birth. 

But their broader agreement on the legality of abortion underscored the state's high levels of pro-abortion support among voters and indicated that the issue remains a lightning rod for Republicans even more than three years after the Supreme Court repealed Roe v. Wade. 

Elsewhere, the candidates differed on LGBT issues. Ciattarelli had called for men who believe they are women to be barred from women's sports, while Sherrill voted against federal legislation that would have barred men from competing in girls' sporting leagues. 

The Republican had also advocated rolling back pro-LGBT curriculums in public schools. Sherrill, in contrast, had voted against a federal bill that would have required schools to inform parents if their children began identifying as the opposite sex at school. 

Ciattarelli had also called for a state school voucher program modeled after Florida's successful voucher initiative. Such a measure would "allow parents real choices in the schools their children attend," he said ahead of the election. 

In October, the state's bishops affirmed the Church's teaching on the electoral process by telling the faithful that it is "not the Church's place to tell them how to vote." 

"Each of us has the right — and the responsibility — to follow our conscience, shaped by Scripture and the Church's wisdom," the bishops said.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=Catholic-News&view=post&articleid=289622&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Nov 4, 2025 / 22:25 pm (CNA).

Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani, a Democratic socialist who promotes gender ideology and abortion access, won his bid for mayor of New York City on Nov. 4, decisively defeating his two main opponents: former Gov. Andrew Cuomo and talk show host Curtis Sliwa.

Mamdani, a 34-year-old member of the New York State Assembly and the Democratic Party's nominee for mayor, took 50.4% of the vote on Tuesday. As of 9:42 p.m. ET, 75% of the vote had been tallied.

Cuomo, who served as governor as a Democrat and ran as an independent for mayor, received 41.3% of the vote. Sliwa, the Republican nominee, finished third with 7.5% of the vote.

Mamdani, set to be sworn in on Jan. 1, 2026, will be the city's first Muslim mayor. He will succeed Democratic Mayor Eric Adams, who suspended his reelection bid in late September.

New York City's mayoral race gained significant national attention after Mamdani secured an upset victory in the Democratic primary against Cuomo. Mamdani ran an anti-establishment campaign and called himself "the sole candidate running with a vision for the future of this city" during the final debate.

Mamdani embraced gender ideology during his campaign, vowing to provide $65 million in tax funding for hormone therapy drugs and surgeries as a response to President Donald Trump's executive order to strip federal funding from health care providers that provide such drugs and surgeries to children.

He also intends to create "an office of LGBTQIA+ affairs" and declare New York City a sanctuary for "LGBTQIA+" people. As a member of the Legislature, he also supported a bill to prohibit law enforcement from aiding out-of-state investigations into health care professionals who provide hormone therapy drugs and surgeries to minors.

The mayor-elect's campaign supported abortion access as well. He has promised to double city tax funding for the New York Abortion Access Fund and the city's Abortion Access Hub. He has also vowed to "protect New Yorkers from" pro-life pregnancy centers, which he accused of spreading "false or deceptive information."

Pro-life pregnancy centers have fought numerous lawsuits against states they accuse of censoring their speech in recent years.

Mamdani has also pledged to create a "baby basket" for parents with newborns, which will provide resources, such as diapers, baby wipes, nursing pads, postpartum pads, swaddles, and books. He expects this to cost less than $20 million annually.

The mayor-elect has further vowed to end all city cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and will not use any city resources to help enforce immigration laws. His platform calls for $165 million in funding to support legal defenses for people who are at risk of being deported.

Mamdani has promised to freeze rent for New Yorkers who live in rent-stabilized apartments and eliminate fares for city buses. He plans to establish city-owned grocery stores that he says will provide lower prices and intends to provide no-cost child care for families. He supports raising the minimum wage to $30 by 2030.

To pay for the costs, in part, the mayor-elect has said he will raise the top state corporate tax from 7.5% to 11.5% and add an additional 2% income tax on anyone making more than $1 million annually. He estimates this will generate $9 billion in additional revenue, though critics have questioned those estimations.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=Catholic-News&view=post&articleid=289592&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

ACI Prensa Staff, Nov 4, 2025 / 08:00 am (CNA).

On Oct. 21, Nicolas Sarkozy became the first former French president to walk through a prison gate to begin serving a sentence behind bars.

The former president arrived at La Santé prison in Paris to serve a five-year sentence for illegally financing his 2007 presidential campaign through the regime of Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi. Sarkozy notably took with him two books: "The Count of Monte Cristo" and "The Jesus of History."

The choice of these two titles has not gone unnoticed. In a statement to ACI Prensa, CNA's Spanish-language news partner, the author of the second book, historian and theologian Jean-Christian Petitfils, explained that Sarkozy confessed to him that he had been "deeply affected by reading" the book about Jesus, which was published in 2011.

Petitfils said when he met Sarkozy in person about four years ago, the former president revealed he was particularly interested in the section detailing the miracles of Jesus.

"Sarkozy only had some vague notions from catechism, but he didn't truly know the story of Jesus," the author recounted.

A clear symbolic and political dimension

"He received me at his home, and we talked about the content of my book. He told me he was very interested in miracles, exorcisms, and, of course, the resurrection of Jesus. And I think he believes in the resurrection of Jesus," he commented.

Petitfils met with Sarkozy again after publishing his French-language book in 2022 on the Shroud of Turin titled "The Holy Shroud of Turin: Witness to the Passion of Jesus Christ," in which he defends the relic's authenticity and presents the new research that he says refutes the carbon-14 dating that indicated the cloth is of medieval origin.

Asked about the significance of Sarkozy's decision to take his book about Jesus Christ to prison, Petitfils acknowledged that the gesture has a clear symbolic and political dimension. 

"There is a political message involved," he said, which shows that Sarkozy wanted to draw a parallel with the idea of ??being an unjustly condemned victim. The hero of "The Count of Monte Cristo" is unjustly condemned, and so is Jesus, Petitfils pointed out.

The author also noted that the Christian experience is very meaningful for a prisoner: "The experience of God invites us to understand that we are not alone and that we are always with Christ, even in solitude. All of this naturally pushes us to go beyond our circumstances and to understand transcendence."

Petitfils, a historian and theologian renowned for his studies on the Ancien Régime (the political, economic and social system in France before the 1789 revolution) and the history of Christianity, reconstructs the true figure of Jesus using historical, archaeological, and theological sources.

The book, published in Spanish by Gaia, is based on the latest archaeological discoveries and contemporary biblical exegesis, combining scholarly research with an openness to the dimension of faith that Petitfils considers inseparable from the Christian mystery.

History from a faith perspective

"My book is first and foremost the work of a historian. I tried to outline the personality of Jesus and show that he was not just a prophet or a Jewish reformer. This work delves into the mystery of Jesus' very person. And, as a historian, I am obliged to stop and consider that mystery. The historian cannot 'prove' miracles, much less the Resurrection. But it is clear that faith and history are not incompatible," Petitfils explained.

The book begins in Galilee, in the political and religious context of a Palestine oppressed by Rome and divided by internal tensions. From there, Petitfils traces the biography of a man who preaches love for God and mercy, who tells parables and performs signs that tradition has called miracles, who welcomes the marginalized and proclaims that the kingdom of God is near.

'The Gospels are not myths, but a real history'

Petitfils states that these texts are "not symbolic or mythical narratives, but a real history, albeit with some contradictions between them." 

"They are biographies in the ancient style, as they were written then, and they profoundly testify to the faith of the first Christian communities," he explained.

Since its publication, "The Jesus of History" has enjoyed considerable success in France and numerous other countries, with translations into Italian, Spanish, and Portuguese.

"I've received countless testimonials from people who read it and felt transformed by it. Some told me, 'This book restored my faith' or 'It allowed me to better understand the personality of Jesus.' And that is, in a way, what I wanted to do, respecting the rules of historical research, which is a scientific endeavor," the French writer explained.

The author said he hopes Sarkozy, who began serving his sentence in mid-October, will be among that group. 

This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA's Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=Catholic-News&view=post&articleid=289591&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Vatican City, Nov 4, 2025 / 08:15 am (CNA).

The Vatican's doctrinal office said Tuesday the titles of "Co-Redemptrix" and "Mediatrix" are not appropriate ways to describe Mary's participation in salvation.

In Mater Populi Fidelis ("The Mother of the Faithful People of God"), the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) said when an expression requires frequent explanation to maintain the correct meaning, it becomes unhelpful.

"In this case, the expression 'co-redemptrix' does not help extol Mary as the first and foremost collaborator in the work of redemption and grace, for it carries the risk of eclipsing the exclusive role of Jesus Christ," according to the doctrinal note, released Nov. 4.

Pope Leo XIV approved the document, signed by DDF prefect Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, on Oct. 7.

Mary's contribution to human salvation, specifically the title of "Co-Redemptrix" ("Co-Redeemer"), has been a point of theological debate for decades, with proponents calling for Mary's role in redemption to be declared a dogma but critics saying it exaggerates her importance and could damage efforts for unity with other Christian denominations.

In a preface to the note, Fernández wrote that the document responds to questions the dicastery received in recent decades about Marian devotion and certain Marian titles, and clarifies which are acceptable.

"There are some Marian reflection groups, publications, new devotions, and even requests for Marian dogmas that do not share the same characteristics as popular devotion," the cardinal wrote, adding that some Marian devotions, expressed "intensely through social media," can sow confusion among Catholics.

"This text also aims to deepen the proper foundations of Marian devotion by specifying Mary's place in her relationship with believers in light of the mystery of Christ as the sole mediator and redeemer. This entails a profound fidelity to Catholic identity while also requiring a particular ecumenical effort," Fernández wrote.

In addition to "Co-Redemptrix," the document also addressed at length the Marian title "Mediatrix" or "Mediatrix of All Graces," analyzing related Church teaching on Mary's role as intercessor.

The DDF concluded that "some titles, such as 'Mediatrix of All Graces,' have limits that do not favor a correct understanding of Mary's unique place."

The dicastery encouraged the use of other expressions for Mary, specifically titles referring to her motherhood, including "Mother of God" and "Mother of the Faithful People of God."

"She is the mother who gave the world the author of redemption and of grace, who stood firm at the foot of the cross (cf. John 19:25), suffering alongside her son and offering the pain of her maternal heart pierced by the sword (cf. Luke 2:35)," the document said. "From the Incarnation to the cross and the Resurrection, she was united to Christ in a way that is unique and that far surpasses any other believer."

Emphasizing that Mary was saved by her son, Jesus Christ, "in a particular and anticipatory way," the document explained that "Mary's incomparable greatness lies in what she has received and in her trusting readiness to allow herself to be overtaken by the Spirit."

It warned that "when we strive to attribute active roles to her that are parallel to those of Christ, we move away from the incomparable beauty that is uniquely hers."

Presentation in Rome

Experts on Mariology have have held different positions on the title "Co-Redemptrix," as have different popes.

At a presentation at the Jesuit Curia in Rome on Nov. 4, Fernández emphasized Pope Leo XIV's support for the doctrinal note but said "there is no doubt that this document will not please some people."

He explained that note was intended to help Catholics avoid either exaggerating or underrating the importance of devotion to Mary.

"We care for the people's faith without complicating it with issues that are not among the concerns of the vast majority and that add nothing essential to their love for Mary," he added.

He also called debates online defending Mary as "Co-Redemptrix" evidence of the "maximalism" the dicastery wants to avoid.

The cardinal's approximately 40-minute speech was interrupted on several occasions, including in response to this claim, by an Italian man who called himself Gianfilippo (he declined to give his last name to reporters after the event).

The man, who claimed to be part of a Marian study group of about 30 people, appeared to object to some of Fernández's arguments, shouting that the document "does not please God" and the title of Mary as "Co-Redemptrix" is "is God's eternal truth … which the Church has approved for centuries."

"You must also listen to the laity," the man claimed in a raised voice. "Documents cannot be made like this without listening to the people."

"You are not the people," the cardinal answered. "If you want to write, write to the dicastery."

Fernández added that the dicastery would listen to his position with respect, "but it's not the only one. I recommend [you read] the document."

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=Catholic-News&view=post&articleid=289590&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Buenos Aires, Argentina, Nov 4, 2025 / 09:30 am (CNA).

The destruction of an image of Our Lady of Luján, the patroness of Argentina, and the burning of a chapel has shocked two communities in Argentina. Authorities are currently investigating the acts of vandalism. 

Father Lucas Arguimbau, a priest at St. Cajetan Shrine, a church in Buenos Aires, announced Nov. 2 that the outdoor small shrine to the Blessed Mother located down the street was the target of vandalism this past weekend in which the image of Our Lady of Luján kept there was smashed to pieces.

The news shocked the community, as the small shrine is located in a busy area monitored by security cameras and near a police station. A woman who lives in the neighborhood found fragments of the destroyed image and brought them to the shrine.

After the 11 a.m. All Souls' Day Mass on Nov. 2 at St. Cajetan's, the parochial vicar said: "A neighbor brought us the hands of the statue of Our Lady of Luján, which someone had attacked at the shrine at the corner of Juan B. Justo and Cuzco streets," as reported by the news site La Nación.

The image of the patroness of Argentina was kept in an outdoor shrine protected by a grille and glass, and served as a gathering spot for the community on special occasions.

After Mass, Arguimbau, accompanied by the parochial vicar, a seminarian, and some laypeople, went to the scene of the incident where, in addition to the broken glass and the destroyed statue of Our Lady, they found a statue of St. Cajetan lying on the ground. A crucifix was undamaged.

Although no report had been filed in previous attacks, this time the priest decided to file one at Police Station 10B, where he also took the remains of the statue.

Arguimbau led a simple act of reparation at the site: "We are going to ask God to bless this place again, and we pray especially for those who come to the shrine, for those who broke the image of the Virgin. We ask that God bless us, protect our neighborhood, and grant us peace in our hearts, as St. Cajetan always did, in good times and bad, sowing good," he said. He then blessed the site with holy water, and those present prayed a Hail Mary.

Following the incident, St. Cajetan Shrine is studying ways to reinforce the security and protect the nearby small shrine, while the investigation continues to identify the attackers using images captured by security cameras.

Chapel fire

The attack on the small shrine was not the only one reported in Argentina last weekend, which coincided with Halloween. In the city of Pehuén-Co, in southern Buenos Aires province, Holy Family Chapel was completely destroyed by a fire, the cause of which is under investigation.

In an interview with El Rosalenio, Father Adán Caraballo, who is in charge of the Sacred Heart community and Holy Family Chapel in Pehuén-Co, explained that they are still assessing what happened, especially since graffiti with the number "666" among others were found after the fire.

"The church could have burned down at any other time of year, and it just so happens on this day, and the graffiti appears on this very day. Of course, we understand it from a faith perspective, as too delicate of a situation that has become so widespread globally, trivializing something that should never be trivialized like the night of the witches, like Halloween and all that," he pointed out.

"We understand it as something serious, but we hope it's just a prank by someone who saw the church burning and said, 'Let's put this on it,'" he said, referring to the graffiti.

"The people who have served so much over the years at the chapel are now saddened to see it destroyed," he lamented, indicating that the fire started from inside, although the investigation is still underway.

While the community is deeply saddened, the priest highlighted the support and "incredible generosity" of those who have come forward to help restore the chapel.

He also reported that the tabernacle "was intact, Jesus was intact, the Eucharist was intact," which he considered "a miraculous sign."

This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA's Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=Catholic-News&view=post&articleid=289578&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Nov 3, 2025 / 17:08 pm (CNA).

President Donald Trump's administration will partially fund Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits amid the ongoing government shutdown as Catholic nonprofits are working to accommodate people's needs through charitable giving.

Food stamp benefits from SNAP came to a temporary halt Nov. 1 after Congress failed to reach an agreement to end the government shutdown or approve a stand-alone SNAP funding bill.

Several states sued, which led a federal court to order the administration to fully or partially fund the program. According to a Nov. 3 court filing, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) agreed to drain the SNAP contingency fund to ensure some benefits are received this month.

The contingency fund can supply Americans on food assistance with about $4.6 billion in funds, which is about half of the $9 billion that was expected to be given. It is unclear when the benefits will show up on recipients' Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) cards.

Neither the USDA nor the White House responded to a request for comment.

As the shutdown reached its 34th day on Nov. 3, lawmakers were still disagreeing over extending taxpayer subsidies that lower health insurance costs under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and providing funding for a wall on the southern border, food assistance, and military pay. Most of the 2.9 million civilian federal workers are not receiving paychecks.

Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Georgia, questioned the USDA inspector general nominee John Walk on Oct. 30 about why the contingency fund wasn't being used, which prompted the litigation from states.

"There's nothing legally stopping the administration from making emergency food assistance funds that they're just sitting on available for Georgia kids and families in November," Warnock said. "But even as we debate what to do about these ACA subsidies, it is indisputable that the USDA under the Trump administration is choosing to pull hungry children into this fight."

Filling the gap

Catholic organizations that provide food assistance to low-income people have been trying to fill the gap amid the funding losses. Catholic Charities USA launched a national fundraising effort Oct. 30 to "come to the aid of our vulnerable brothers and sisters during this time of dire need," according to a news release.

Donations made through the new portal "will be used to buy and ship food directly to Catholic Charities agencies throughout the country that operate food pantries, soup kitchens, food delivery programs and a variety of other initiatives to support those facing hunger or food insecurity," the news release noted. 

Some local Catholic Charities affiliates told CNA last week that they were committed to helping families in need access food but expressed concern that their organizations may be unable to fully supplement the billions of dollars in lost funding.

John Berry, president of the Society of St. Vincent de Paul in the United States, said in a statement on Oct. 31 that the funding loss was "a bipartisan moral failure" and alleged that both parties "weaponized the defenseless."

"This crisis is not a distant tragedy: It is right in front of our face in the look in a mother's eyes as she worries that her innocent children may soon feel the ache of an empty stomach," Berry said.

"Its roots run deep in the decisions of policymakers who have chosen partisan brinkmanship over human dignity, and the consequences demand an urgent moral critique through faith and reason," he said. "This is not a partisan failure. Ironically, it's one of the few times that both sides of the political aisle have managed to do something together — morally fail in their efforts to appeal to their supporters."

Archbishop Timothy Broglio, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, in an Oct. 28 statement urged lawmakers to find a solution that reopens the government and funds SNAP.

Broglio called the funding loss "unjust and unacceptable" and "catastrophic for families and individuals who rely on SNAP to put food on the table." He said it "places the burdens of this shutdown most heavily on the poor and vulnerable of our nation, who are the least able to move forward." 

The shutdown is already the second-longest government shutdown. Unless it is quickly resolved, it will likely surpass the longest government shutdown, which was 35 days long and occurred during Trump's first term.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=Catholic-News&view=post&articleid=289577&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Nov 3, 2025 / 17:52 pm (CNA).

The Heritage Foundation is receiving backlash after Kevin Roberts, its president, defended Tucker Carlson's recent controversial interview with Nick Fuentes. 

Roberts said in a video message on social media Oct. 30 that "the venomous coalition attacking [Carlson] are sowing division" and that "their attempt to cancel him will fail." While the Heritage Foundation president said he disagreed with and abhorred Fuentes' views, he said "canceling him is not the answer." 

"When we disagree with a person's thoughts and opinions, we challenge those ideas and debate," Roberts said. "And we have seen success in this approach as we continue to dismantle the vile ideas of the left." 

During the interview, Fuentes, who said he is Catholic, at one point said he admired Joseph Stalin and lamented against "organized Jewry in America." For his part, Carlson at another point said he disliked Christian Zionists "more than anybody" and referred to Christian Zionism as a "brain virus" and a "Christian heresy." 

Reports also surfaced that the Heritage Foundation had spent roughly $1.2 million sponsoring Carlson's show, for about $75,000 per episode for a 12-month period beginning in June 2024. 

Fallout ensued after Roberts' video, with Heritage Foundation staffers posting a meme with the caption "Nazis are bad" in reference to Fuentes' antisemetic views and self-professed admiration of Hitler. 

The Hill initially reported further dissatisfaction among staffers and that Ryan Neuhaus, Roberts' chief of staff, had been relocated Friday to another position within the organization. This came after Neuhaus reposted multiple statements in defense of Roberts' video. Neuhaus has since resigned. 

Legal scholar and moral philosopher Robert P. George weighed in on the debate surrounding Carlson's interview Nov. 1, writing: "Engaging and forcefully arguing against people who deny the inherent and equal dignity of all is one thing, welcoming them into the movement or treating their ideas and ideologies as representing legitimate forms of conservatism is something entirely different."

He said American conservatism faces a challenge from those like Fuentes "seeking acceptance in the conservative movement and its institutions" with the ultimate goal of subverting "our commitment to inherent and equal human dignity." 

"It is incumbent upon those of us who maintain the 'ancient faith' (to borrow a phrase from Lincoln) to make clear to friend and foe alike that we will not permit the integrity of our movement and its institutions to be compromised," George concluded. 

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=Catholic-News&view=post&articleid=289576&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Nov 3, 2025 / 18:30 pm (CNA).

U.S. President Donald Trump threatened military action against Nigeria if it fails to end Christian persecution.

"If the Nigerian government continues to allow the killing of Christians, the U.S.A. will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria and may very well go into that now-disgraced country, 'guns-a-blazing,' to completely wipe out the Islamic terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities," Trump said in a social media post Nov. 1.

The commander-in-chief further revealed he has instructed the Pentagon to "prepare for possible action."

"If we attack, it will be fast, vicious, and sweet, just like the terrorist thugs attack our CHERISHED Christians!" he added: "WARNING: THE NIGERIAN GOVERNMENT BETTER MOVE FAST!"

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth responded to the post on Saturday, writing: "The killing of innocent Christians in Nigeria — and anywhere — must end immediately. The Department of War is preparing for action. Either the Nigerian government protects Christians, or we will kill the Islamic terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities."

The post alluding to possible military action comes after Trump announced he would designate Nigeria as a country of particular concern (CPC) on Oct. 31.

Under the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, the U.S president must designate countries that engage in or tolerate "particularly severe violations of religious freedom" as CPCs. Violations include torture, prolonged detention without charges, and forced disappearence, according to the State Department.

"Christianity is facing an existential threat in Nigeria. Thousands of Christians are being killed. Radical Islamists are responsible for this mass slaughter. I am hereby making Nigeria a 'COUNTRY OF PARTICULAR CONCERN,'" Trump said Oct. 31.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=Catholic-News&view=post&articleid=289569&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

ACI Prensa Staff, Nov 3, 2025 / 14:49 pm (CNA).

After Carlos Manzo, the mayor of Uruapan, a city in the Mexican state of Michoacán, was assassinated Nov. 1, the Mexican Bishops' Conference strongly condemned the act, calling for the government to address the root of the violence plaguing the country.

The murder occurred during the Day of the Dead celebrations in the city's main square, when an armed man approached the mayor and shot him at point-blank range. The assassin was killed at the scene.

Manzo, who died minutes later, had repeatedly denounced the presence of criminal groups in the area and requested support from Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and Security Secretary Omar García Harfuch to curb organized crime.

In a September interview, Manzo had denounced the fact that the violence is caused not only by gangs but also primarily by "criminal groups, very powerful cartels."

The mayor said at the time that he felt afraid. "I don't want to be just another mayor on the list of those executed, those whose lives have been taken from them. I don't want the municipal police to continue becoming statistics, nor the honest and honorable working citizens who are victims of this social cancer," he stated.

According to the Mexican new outlet Notus, 10 mayors have been assassinated in the country since Sheinbaum was elected on Oct. 1, 2024.

The security cabinet, headed by Harfuch, reported on Nov. 2 that the mayor had been assigned a security detail since December 2024; however, "the assailants took advantage of [Manzo's]  vulnerability during a public event to plan the attack."

Manzo's murder follows that of Bernardo Bravo Manríquez, which occurred on Oct. 19. Bravo was president of the Citrus Growers Association of the Apatzingán Valley and had spoken out about the pressure exerted by organized crime on agricultural producers.

Combatting the roots of violence

In a Nov. 2 message, the Mexican Bishops' Conference denounced the presence of "armed groups that control public life" in certain communities across the country.

"Gang-controlled checkpoints on roads, land seizures, and constant threats against producers, merchants, and government officials reflect a serious weakening of the constitutional order that governments at the municipal, state, and federal levels are obligated to guarantee," they stated.

The bishops demanded "determination and astuteness" from the authorities to stop not only the murders of public officials but also the threats against the lives of "thousands of citizens whose freedoms are violated daily as they move about and carry out their commercial and recreational activities."

They urged authorities to "confront the lack of rule of law" in the country. "Today, it is no longer enough to apprehend the murderer: We must combat with determination the cause of all these murders," they stated.

The conference also expressed its solidarity with those who, "even amid contexts marked by violence, remain faithful to their mission of proclaiming the Gospel." 

Their "silent and courageous dedication," the statement continued, "is a living sign of Christ's presence among his people, reminding us that light is never extinguished in the face of darkness."

Finally, the prelates prayed that Our Lady of Guadalupe "would guide our hearts and intercede for us so that together we may achieve the peace, freedom, and development that our Mexico deserves."

This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA's Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA.

Full Article