Catholic News

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=288979&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Vatican City, Oct 9, 2025 / 13:25 pm (CNA).

Bishop Mark Seitz of El Paso, Texas, said immigration is a "Gospel issue" before it is a "political issue" in the United States. 

In an exclusive interview with EWTN News reporter Valentina Di Donato, Seitz said the Church has a responsibility to reaffirm Catholic social teaching regarding the preferential option for the poor. 

"It's always the role of the bishop to speak the Gospel, to reflect on that Gospel and its implications for our daily lives," the prelate told EWTN News. 

"We have a task to form people based on that teaching of love and mercy and compassion that applies not just in exceptional cases, not just to certain people, but in a special way to the poor and the vulnerable, and that includes immigrants," he said. 

Speaking about the "inalienable rights" every person is endowed with by God, the bishop said the rights of immigrants should not only be a concern of the Church but should also be "respected in law."

"While we are not politicians — it's not our task to develop rules and laws — we are responsible to help form consciences and bring people back to the basic underlying principles, which, by the way, are principles upon which our country was built," he said.

According to the bishop, U.S. asylum law is not being respected "right now," as several migrant families living in the El Paso Diocese, located near the U.S.-Mexico border, no longer feel protected and fear deportation. 

"We should practice that [respect for] human dignity when we are dealing with a person who simply fled here because they had no other option," he told EWTN News.

Having ministered to families who have felt threatened by criminal drug gangs, Seitz said it is unjust to deny asylum or security for those seeking protection outside of their countries of origin, especially when the gangs' activities are "supported by our drug addiction in the United States." 

Earlier this week, Pope Leo XIV met with Seitz, El Paso Auxiliary Bishop Anthony Celino, and Dylan Corbett of Hope Border Institute in a private Oct. 8 meeting at the Vatican. 

During the meeting, the bishop shared a four-minute video and handwritten letters from migrant families expressing their faith as well as their fears about the future.

"I said, 'Holy Father, we're so happy to stand with you,'" Seitz said, recalling the encounter. "Later on in the meeting [the pope] came back to that and he said, 'In matters of injustice, the Church has to speak and, in that, I stand with you.'"

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=288978&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Oct 9, 2025 / 14:28 pm (CNA).

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) has chosen Catholic media companies Ascension and Word on Fire to publish the Liturgy of the Hours, Second Edition.

The Liturgy of the Hours, also known as the Divine Office, is a set of daily prayers that priests and religious are obliged to pray and that many lay Catholics also partake in. The prayers are set according to the Church calendar and are composed of psalms, hymns, and readings from Scripture.

In November 2012, the U.S. bishops voted to revise the translation, following English translations of the Roman Missal, Third Edition, and the 2001 Vatican document Liturgiam Authenticam. The approval process was completed in November 2024 and on May 29 of this year, the USCCB sent the completed manuscript to the Holy See for confirmation.

Ascension and Word on Fire, both known for their print, online, and video works, announced Oct. 7 that they will each publish the new version of the Liturgy of the Hours. A release date for the daily prayer will be shared upon final approval from the Vatican. 

The current edition was translated and designed in the 1970s, making the new version the first updated English translation of the prayer in more than 50 years. It has been developed over the past decade by the USCCB in collaboration with the International Commission on English in the Liturgy (ICEL). 

"Our goal is to create a reverent and beautiful edition that embodies the dignity of the Church's common prayer. This new translation marks an extraordinary moment for Catholics everywhere," said Jonathan Strate, president and CEO of Ascension, in an announcement. Strate said Ascension is "honored to serve the Church" by being one of the publishers.

Ascension, known for its popular podcast "The Bible in a Year with Mike Schmitz," reported publishing the prayers "furthers its mission in creating resources to help Catholics deepen their prayer life, joining the universal Church in encountering the truth and beauty of the Catholic faith."

"When you pray the Liturgy of the Hours, you are uniting your prayer to the entire Church," Schmitz said in a recent video explaining the Liturgy of the Hours. He added: "It gives us the opportunity to create holy time… by stopping at various moments throughout the day and calling upon the Lord, renewing our mind with his word."

"This is more than a publishing project — it is a spiritual mission," Word on Fire founder Bishop Robert Barron said in a press release. "We want to help thousands of priests, religious, and laypeople pray more deeply and more beautifully each day." The new version, he said, is "a profound service to the Church and to the world."

Word on Fire has "spent the past three years introducing tens of thousands of Catholics to this rhythm of daily prayer through our monthly booklets," said Brandon Vogt, senior publishing director at Word on Fire. "This four-volume series is the next step … that will draw countless more into the Church's ancient prayer, day by day, hour by hour." 

The Liturgy of the Hours is "the Church's highest prayer outside the Mass and sacraments," Vogt said. "Our aim is simple — to create the most beautiful, most prayerful, most accessible edition of the Liturgy of the Hours ever produced."

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=288960&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Oct 8, 2025 / 17:13 pm (CNA).

Pope Leo XIV became "visibly emotional" upon receiving messages on Oct. 8 from immigrants fearing deportation in the United States, a member of a U.S. delegation said.

Bishop Mark Seitz of El Paso, Texas, Auxiliary Bishop Anthony Celino, and Dylan Corbett of Hope Border Institute gave the pope a collection of handwritten letters from migrant families expressing fear and faith. They showed the pope a video with immigrants' voices saying mass deportations in the United States are breaking family bonds and stripping children of safety.

"We live in a state of constant anxiety, never knowing if tomorrow will bring separation," an immigrant says in the video.

Corbett posted on X that Leo told the delegation, which included immigrants: "The Church cannot stay silent before injustice. You stand with me, and I stand with you." 

One letter writer expressed fear of leaving the house, even to see a doctor, and asked for prayers for President Donald Trump that his heart may be filled with love, compassion, and empathy. The Trump administration is undertaking a massive expansion of enforcement, detention, and border control efforts.

'You could see tears in his eyes'

Corbett, founding executive director of Hope Border Institute, described the 25-minute encounter with Pope Leo to CNA.

"Bishop Seitz spoke about the Church in the United States' commitment to walking alongside immigrants and refugees in our country," Corbett recalled, noting Seitz's remarks had been unscripted. "And the Holy Father quickly said he wanted the Church in the United States to be more united and forceful on this issue, and that what's happening right now is an injustice." 

"We were then able to share from our perspective some of what we're seeing across the United States right now in terms of the campaign of mass deportations," he continued, adding: "The Holy Father grew visibly emotional about that."

The group presented Leo with "over 100 letters from immigrants across the country who are at risk of deportation or who are in mixed families." The delegation also presented the Holy Father with a video featuring "voices drawn from those letters that tell the story of the anxieties and fears, and also the hopes, right now of the immigrant community." 

At this point, Corbett said Leo "became emotional and you could see tears in his eyes." 

"He was very supportive and encouraging," Corbett said, noting several representatives from the immigrant community were also present for the meeting and offered their testimonies. 

Fernie Ceniceros, a spokesperson for the El Paso Diocese, told CNA: "The Diocese of El Paso is thrilled to know that the Holy Father was able to meet with Bishop Mark Seitz and our Auxiliary Bishop Anthony Celino and a small delegation of local immigration advocates that included clergy from with the diocese."

"We are blessed to know that the Holy Father expressed his support of migrants along the U.S.-Mexico border along with migrants all over the world," he added. 

Ceniceros shared several images of the letters given to Leo, including one in English and one in Spanish. 

One of the letters sent by an El Paso priest on loan from the Srikakulam Diocese in Andhra Pradesh, India, described "feeling a sort of insecurity … due to the immigration situation" and noted that many are "scared to move comfortably even with legal documentation." 

The letter further appealed to the Holy Father for papal support in being "a voice for the voiceless" while also "uphold[ing]  the right of nations to regulate borders and the right of people to seek a better life."

Another letter from an anonymous immigrant lacking legal status in California told Leo: "These days we are living with a lot of fear, confusion, and sadness." The letter appealed to the Holy Father to "continue petitioning our God and to continue listening to the voice of the needy immigrant community, raising his voice alongside our brothers and sisters from separated families." 

"Thank you for listening to us," it concluded. 

Messages from migrants

One letter said:

"Dear Pope Leo, there are two members of my family without documents. I feel afraid to go out to work and that I could be separated from my family. I think that there should be demand for the immigration agents not to be allowed to get close to parishes, and the raids should stop, because they only create pain and fear. I think the pope should be openly against the raids, and the unjust treatment that's affecting the community. Speaking clearly and concisely about the situation that we are in and condemning the way in which so-called Christians in power are acting."

Another letter said:

"We are a mixed family. I am very sad, with a lot of pain and fear. I have not gone out for two weeks and when I do go out, I'm afraid, even when I have to go to the doctor. I think that the Church could help us in getting immigration lawyers to support us and all of those who have been detained. The Church could also give protection to families that remain here. Pope Leo, you know the whole situation that the world is living in, that there is a lot of pain and that we don't have peace. We ask for your prayers and that you would speak to those who you should speak to. I also ask for prayers for Donald Trump for his heart to be filled with love, compassion, and empathy."

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=288956&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Rome Newsroom, Oct 8, 2025 / 08:00 am (CNA).

For the first time, the body of St. Francis of Assisi will be visible to all, from Feb. 22 to March 22, 2026. This religious and historical event was announced on the memorial of the saint of Assisi (Oct. 4) and will coincide with the eighth centenary of the death of St. Francis in 1226.

The announcement was made from the Loggia delle Benedizioni by Fray Giulio Cesareo, director of the press office of the Sacred Convent, following Mass celebrated in the Upper Basilica of the Umbrian city, presided over by Monsignor Camillo Cibotti, president of the Episcopal Conference of Abruzzo and Molise, along with Cardinal Ángel Fernández Artime, papal legate for the papal basilicas of Assisi, the bishop of Assisi, and the general and provincial ministries of the Franciscan families.

In his homily, Cibotti emphasized the "newness of life" that Francis presents to the world. "A new way of feeling, of thinking, of living Christ," Cibotti noted. The mayor of L'Aquila, Pierluigi Biondi, lit the votive lamp of the Municipalities of Italy, representing the Italian people during the celebration.

The first part of the celebration for the feast of St. Francis, patron saint of Italy, concluded with speeches from the authorities from the loggia of the sacred convent. Reference was also made to the reinstatement of Oct. 4 as a national holiday in that country.

"In recent days, Parliament approved the law making Oct. 4 a national holiday," declared the custos of the Sacred Convent, Friar Marco Moroni, OFMConv, at the beginning of the celebration in the basilica. "This is not just a tribute to the patron saint of Italy, but a recognition of values ??that speak to everyone. For this celebration to be truly fruitful, everyone must draw concrete consequences from it: our communities with their daily lives; local governments with their choices for justice and inclusion; Parliament and the government with laws and policies consistent with what is proclaimed today; each of us with sober and fraternal lifestyle choices." 

Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, also present at the celebration, addressed Italy from the loggia of the Sacred Convent: "The devotion of Italians to St. Francis is strong, authentic, and visceral, which can be seen in the faces of the pilgrims present here. Today the Italian people turn their gaze here, to Assisi, because St. Francis is one of the founding figures of the Italian identity. Francis of Assisi was a man of action, extreme but not extremist. Today we celebrate Francis not because he needs us, but because we need him."

At the celebration the exposition of the remains of St. Francis in 2026 was also announced. The press release from the Sacred Convent of Assisi stated: "This exposition, rooted in the evangelical theme of the seed that dies to bear fruit in love and brotherhood, invites us to consider the life of the saint, who continues to bear fruit after 800 years and to inspire all humanity on the path of peace, brotherhood, service to the least, joy and care for creation."

"The eighth centenary of the death of St. Francis, in 2026, is a time of remembrance and renewal. We do not celebrate death, but, recognizing it as a 'sister' to St. Francis, we celebrate the life that blossoms from the gift and offering of self," the statement continued.

"It is in this spirit that, thanks to the approval granted by the Holy Father Leo XIV through the Vatican Secretariat of State, the public display of his mortal remains will take place," the statement said.

The body of St. Francis will be moved from his tomb, located in the crypt, and placed at the foot of the papal altar in the lower church of the Basilica of St. Francis. The tomb's history itself holds significant historical and religious significance: after the death of the Poverello saint, "the body was made inaccessible," the press office of the Sacred Convent explained, "beneath the basilica's high altar to prevent any possible theft. It remained hidden for centuries, until, after a long and arduous search, it was finally discovered on the night between Dec. 12 and 13, 1818."

The first official recognition took place in 1819, confirming the identity of the remains of the saint of Assisi. There are also other recognitions, such as the one in 1978, in preparation for the 750th anniversary of his death, and the most recent one in 2015.

For more information: www.sanfrancescovive.org

This story was first published by ACI Stampa, CNA's Italian-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA/ACI Prensa.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=288955&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

CNA Staff, Oct 8, 2025 / 09:00 am (CNA).

The U.S. Catholic bishops sharply criticized the Trump administration's recent approval of the generic abortion drug mifepristone, saying that women and children deserve better care. 

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the drug even as the administration is currently investigating the abortion drug for safety concerns. 

U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has previously acknowledged concerns over the safety of the drug and said in a hearing last month that the investigation is ongoing. Even so, the FDA's approval of the generic version will make the drug even more accessible. 

"Mothers in need and their preborn children deserve better," said Bishop Daniel Thomas, who heads the U.S. bishops' pro-life committee, in response to the FDA's decision. 

In a statement, Thomas called the decision "jarring" and "contradictory."

"At the same time that the Food and Drug Administration is conducting a much-needed review of the supposed safety of the abortion pill for women, it is nonetheless approving a new generic for this deadly drug," Thomas said.

"The FDA took shortcuts in originally approving and loosening protocols for mifepristone, which enabled the killing of more children and placed the health of more women in danger," he continued.

More than 1 in 10 women who take the abortion pill mifepristone to complete a chemical abortion will suffer a serious health complication within 45 days of taking the drug, a study by the Ethics and Public Policy Center found.

The study also found that the rate of serious adverse side effects occurs at 22 times the rate that the FDA-approved drug label currently indicates.

"Even if it eventually had to be approved as a generic version of the same drug, to do so now and make it more available before a recently-announced safety study can be completed and potentially save lives, is a shocking inconsistency," Thomas said. 

Dangers of drug 

Dr. Susan Bane, vice chair of the board of directors of American Association of Pro-life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, called the FDA's decision "a serious misjudgment that will have deadly consequences." 

Mifepristone poses a danger "not only to preborn babies but to unsuspecting pregnant women as well," Bane, an OB-GYN with more than 25 years of experience in women's health care, told CNA.

"When the side effects of this drug are already misreported and under-investigated, expanding access to it is the wrong course of action," she said. 

Jennie Bradley Lichter, March for Life president, said she is "devastated" by the decision. 

"I'm devastated that this dangerous drug, which has serious adverse effects for 11% of women who take it, is getting a stronger and stronger foothold," she said in a statement shared with CNA. 

Noting that the agency "has limited discretion under the law to decline approval for a generic that matches an approved name-brand drug," Lichter expressed concerns for women and children.  

"Every day that mifepristone remains on the market, with very few safeguards in place around it, heaps danger upon danger for American women and results in more and more babies being killed," Lichter said. 

Evita Solutions, LLC, the pro-abortion company producing the generic drug, has said it seeks to "normalize abortion." 

But Thomas highlighted the importance of support and care for women and children.

Mothers and children "deserve the fullest, most authentic care that we can offer in all respects," the bishop said.

Thomas looked ahead to the FDA investigation of the abortion drug mifepristone.

"I pray that the forthcoming review of mifepristone will undo many of these tragic developments and that we may, instead, meet women with hope and meaningful support," he said.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=288954&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Oct 8, 2025 / 10:00 am (CNA).

The U.S. Supreme Court during oral arguments on Oct. 7 scrutinized Colorado's law banning counseling on gender identity with some justices voicing concern about possible viewpoint discrimination and free speech restrictions embedded in the statute.

Colorado Solicitor General Shannon Stevenson defended the law, which prohibits licensed psychologists and therapists from engaging in any efforts that it considers "conversion therapy" when treating minors. It does not apply to parents, members of the clergy, or others.

Nearly half of U.S. states have a similar ban. The Supreme Court ruling on this matter could set nationwide precedent on the legality of such laws. 

The Colorado law defines "conversion therapy" as treatments designed to change a person's "sexual orientation or gender identity," including changes to "behaviors or gender expressions or to eliminate or reduce sexual or romantic attraction or feelings toward individuals of the same sex" even if the minor and his or her family has requested that care.

Under the law, permitted therapy includes "acceptance, support, and understanding" of a minor's self-asserted transgender identity or same-sex attraction.

The law is being challenged by Kaley Chiles, a Christian counselor who provides faith-based counseling to clients with gender dysphoria and same-sex attraction.

Free speech and viewpoint discrimination

Stevenson argued that Colorado's law is not a speech restriction but instead a regulation on a specific type of "treatment," saying that regulations cannot cease to apply "just because they are using words."

"That treatment does not work and carries great risk of harm," Stevenson said, referring to the practices the state considers to be "conversion therapy."

She argued that health care has been "heavily regulated since the beginning of our country" and compared "conversion therapy" to doctors providing improper advice on how to treat a condition. She claimed this therapy falsely asserts "you can change this innate thing about yourself."

"The client and the patient [are] expecting accurate information," Stevenson said.

Justice Samuel Alito told Stevenson the law sounds like "blatant viewpoint discrimination," noting that a minor can receive talk therapy welcoming homosexual inclinations but cannot access therapy to reduce those urges. He said it is a restriction "based on the viewpoint expressed."

Alito said the state's position is "a minor should not be able to obtain talk therapy to overcome same-sex attraction [even] if that's what he wants."

Stevenson argued Colorado is not engaged in viewpoint discrimination and said: "Counseling is an evidence-based practice." She said it would be wrong to suggest lawmakers "reach[ed] this conclusion based on anything other than protection of minors."

"There is no other motive going on to suppress viewpoint or expression," Stevenson said.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Justice Neil Gorsuch asked questions about how to handle issues where medical disagreement exists.

Gorsuch noted, for example, that homosexuality was historically viewed as a mental disorder and asked Stevenson whether it would have been legal for states to ban therapy that affirmed a person's homosexuality at that time. Stevenson argued that at that time, it would have been legal.

Banning 'voluntary conversations'

Alliance Defending Freedom Chief Counsel Jim Campbell argued on behalf of Chiles and her counseling services, telling the justices his client offers "voluntary speech between a licensed professional and a minor," and the law bans "voluntary conversations."

Campbell noted that if one of her minor clients says, "I would like help realigning my identity with my sex," then the law requires that Chiles "has to deny them."

"Kids and families that want this kind of help … are being left without any kind of support," he added, warning that Chiles, her clients, and potential clients are suffering irreparable harm if access to this treatment continues to be denied.

Campbell argued that "many people have experienced life-changing benefits from this kind of counseling," many of whom are seeking to "align their life with their religion" and improve their "relationship with God."

Justice Sonia Sotomayor contested whether the issue was about free speech, noting Colorado pointed to studies that such therapy efforts "harm the child … emotionally and physically."

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson similarly objected to the claim, questioning whether a counselor acting in her professional capacity "is really expressing … a message for a First Amendment purposes." She said treatment is different than writing an article about conversion therapy or giving a speech about it.

Campbell disagreed, arguing: "This involves a conversation," and "a one-on-one conversation is a form of speech." He said Chiles is "discussing concepts of identity and behaviors and attraction" and simply helping her clients "achieve their goals."

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=288953&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Oct 8, 2025 / 11:00 am (CNA).

Brooklyn Bishop Robert Brennan is moving where the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM) will take place in the diocese, and who will say it, as the diocese faces a clergy shortage following several priest deaths.

"Bishop Brennan very much wants to meet the needs of the people and has developed an approach that will be more sustainable," diocesan spokesman John Quaglione told CNA. 

At the end of September, TLM attendees at St. Cecilia Church in Brooklyn were informed the Mass will no longer be offered there after Oct. 12 but will continue to be offered about five miles away at Our Lady Queen of Peace in the Carroll Gardens section of Brooklyn and St. Josaphat's in the Bayside area of Queens.

Quaglione told CNA that the weekly attendance at the Mass at St. Cecilia's was averaging between 25 and 35 people and was being served by a rotation of priests that can no longer continue because of the declining numbers of parish priests in the diocese.

In order to address the priest shortage, Brennan is employing a "site model." The official site in Brooklyn will be Our Lady Queen of Peace, which has celebrated the TLM for more than 25 years, and the official site in Queens will be at St. Josaphat's, which has also celebrated the TLM for years and which will now be run by the Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest.

Priests will still rotate to say the Latin Mass at the Brooklyn site.

Quaglione told CNA that with the recent deaths of several priests in the Brooklyn Diocese, where priests already minister to two or three parishes each and where Masses have had to be cut as a result, "the bishop is taking the initiative here and seeing the writing on the wall. He does want to provide the TLM for the people." 

"By cutting the Mass at the St. Cecilia site, we're actually bettering our ability to provide the TLM with this model, which addresses staffing concerns and gives the assurance of the continuation of the Mass," he said.

Average weekly Mass attendance at St. Josaphat's is around 240 people, and at Our Lady Queen of Peace, it averages about 65 attendees, according to Quaglione.

Neither the revised official Mass schedule nor the exact date of the Christ the King Institute takeover of St. Josaphat's has been finalized, according to the Brooklyn Diocese.

The Christ the King Institute priests will establish an oratory at St. Josaphat Parish, which other orders in the diocese have already done, according to the press secretary.

According to its website, the Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest "celebrates the classical Roman Liturgy, the 'Latin Mass,' in its traditional form according to the liturgical books promulgated in 1962 by Pope St. John XXIII."

"During his pontificate, Pope St. John Paul II exhorted bishops to be generous in allowing its use. It was with his blessing that the Institute began to celebrate the Traditional Mass."

The institute, based out of Chicago, did not respond to a request for comment.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=288952&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

CNA Staff, Oct 8, 2025 / 12:00 pm (CNA).

A Native American group working to stop the destruction of a centuries-old religious ritual site has lost a last-ditch appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court to halt the transfer and obliteration of the Arizona parcel.

The Supreme Court in an unsigned order on Oct. 6 said Apache Stronghold's petition for a rehearing had been denied. The court did not give a reason for the denial.

Justice Neil Gorsuch would have granted the request, the order noted. Justice Samuel Alito, meanwhile, "took no part in the consideration or decision" of the order. 

The denial likely deals a death blow to the Apache group's attempts to halt the destruction of Oak Flat, which has been viewed as a sacred site by Apaches and other Native American groups for hundreds of years and has been used extensively for religious rituals. 

The federal government is selling the land to the multinational Resolution Copper company, which plans to destroy the site as part of a copper mining operation. 

The coalition had brought the lawsuit to the Supreme Court earlier this year under the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act, arguing that the sale of the site would violate the decades-old federal statute restricting the government's ability to encroach on religious liberty. 

The high court in May refused to hear the case. Gorsuch dissented from that decision as well, arguing that the court "should at least have troubled itself to hear [the] case" before "allowing the government to destroy the Apaches' sacred site."

Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the May ruling as well, though he did not add his dissent to the Oct. 6 denial of the appeal. 

In a statement, Apache Stronghold said that while the decision was "deeply disappointing, the fight to protect Oak Flat is far from over."

The group vowed to "continue pressing our cases in the lower courts."

"Oak Flat deserves the same respect and protection this country has long given to other places of worship," the group said.

The coalition has garnered support from major Catholic backers in its religious liberty bid. Last year the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops joined an amicus brief arguing that lower court decisions allowing the sale of Oak Flat represent "a grave misunderstanding" of religious freedom law. 

The Knights of Columbus similarly filed a brief in support of the Apaches, arguing that the decision to allow the property to be mined applies an "atextual constraint" to the federal religious freedom law with "no grounding in the statute itself."

Though Apache Stronghold appears to have exhausted its legal options, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit said on Aug. 18 that the Oak Flat site would not be transferred to Resolution Copper amid emergency petitions from the San Carlos Apache Tribe as well as the Arizona Mining Reform Coalition. That dispute is still playing out at federal court.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=288948&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

CNA Staff, Oct 8, 2025 / 06:00 am (CNA).

A New Jersey teacher's dismissal from her Catholic school classroom over her role as a surrogate mother has raised the question of just when Catholic employers can dismiss workers for not adhering to the faith. 

The teacher, Jadira Bonilla, was put on paid administrative leave after school officials discovered that she had agreed to serve as a surrogate for another couple. She told a Philadelphia news station that she had previously served as a surrogate for the same couple without incident while working at another Catholic school.

Administrators at St. Mary Catholic School in Vineland "said I was possibly in violation of my contract and that I would be suspended or placed on administrative leave," the teacher told the news outlet. 

Bonilla "is a valued teacher and one we hope will one day again teach in our school with the full knowledge of our faith, which guides our educational principles," the school told the media in a statement. 

Court rulings protect Catholic employers

L. Martin Nussbaum, an attorney who specializes in First Amendment and religious freedom protections and who serves as counsel for the Catholic Benefits Association, said there are "many protections for Catholic employers" in the United States. 

The Catholic Benefits Association says on its website that it "advocates for and litigates in defense of our members' First Amendment rights to provide employee benefits and a work environment that is consistent with the Catholic faith." 

The organization notes that "new regulations, laws, legal outcomes, and legislation" can affect how Catholic employers can do business, though Nussbaum said there are "a number of very powerful protections" for Catholic businesses in the U.S. 

It is unclear if Bonilla, the New Jersey teacher, has filed a lawsuit against the school over its policies, but Nussbaum said if she did, "she would probably file it under a discrimination lawsuit, under the basis of pregnancy, which is a protected class under some laws."

Yet the school and other Catholic employers can cite multiple Supreme Court rulings in their defense, Nussbaum said. Among them is the landmark 2012 Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

In that decision the high court ruled unanimously that the First Amendment allows religious organizations to hire and fire ministers without regard to federal discrimination laws. A ruling in 2020's Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru further strengthened that principle. 

The rule applies to teachers as well, "especially if they're involved in helping inculcate the faith," Nussbaum said.

"[That's] the only reason Catholic schools exist," he noted. "You can hire a secular atheist to teach a child to read. But parents make tremendous sacrifices to put their children in Catholic schools, not only to read and write, but to transmit the faith."

More broadly, for decades U.S. case law has recognized the right to "freedom of association." 

In the Supreme Court's landmark 2000 ruling in Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, the court held that the government is not allowed to "compel [an] organization to accept members where such acceptance would derogate from the organization's expressive message." In that ruling, the court denied efforts by a gay man to force the Boy Scouts of America to allow him to be a scoutmaster. 

Nussbaum said that state laws can offer protection in addition to federal shields. In 2023, for instance, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that a "religious tenets" exception to a state nondiscrimination law allowed a Catholic school to fire a teacher who became pregnant out of wedlock.

Nussbaum said there is "some variation around the edges" regarding state laws but that the federal rulings make religious protections "really quite strong across all the states."

He said Catholic employers can take care to ensure they are within the law in hiring and firing decisions in part by outlining the religious dimensions and roles of jobs. "That should be articulated," he said.

The attorney said disputes over transgender identity and ideology have opened up new avenues for plaintiffs to potentially sue Catholic employers over religious employment decisions.

But "the law is quite strong for vindicating the freedom of religious institutions to insist that those who are advancing the religious mission are in line with that mission," he said.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=288947&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Richmond, Virginia, Oct 8, 2025 / 07:00 am (CNA).

Virginia's two Catholic bishops are urging voters to "form [their] consciences and vote" in the state's upcoming gubernatorial election that could also see the state poised to pass a far-reaching pro-abortion constitutional amendment.

The Virginia Catholic Conference at its "Election 2025 Resource Hub" tells voters that every seat in the state House of Delegates is up for vote, while the state's top-ranking executive positions of governor, lieutenant governor, and attorney general are also in play. 

"While every year in Virginia is an election year, this November's elections are poised to have an outsized impact on our Commonwealth," the bishops said. 

They pointed to the state government's ongoing consideration of an "extreme constitutional amendment" that would establish a so-called "right" to abortion. 

A letter from Arlington Bishop Michael Burbidge and Richmond Bishop Barry Knestout said the amendment would "allow virtually unlimited abortion at any stage of pregnancy." 

The text of the proposal would establish a "fundamental right to reproductive freedom" and would only allow regulating abortion in the final three months of pregnancy. 

The state, however, would be forbidden from restricting an abortion if a doctor determined it would negatively affect the "physical and mental health" of the mother, a provision that pro-life advocates have argued essentially preempts any regulation of abortion whatsoever.

In a voting guide the state Catholic conference noted that the "extreme, radical, and deadly" amendment includes no age restrictions or safety standards and also "jeopardizes" the state's parental consent laws and conscience protections for health care workers. 

Other proposed amendments include one that would remove a "one man and one woman" definition of marriage from the state constitution as well as a proposal backed by the state bishops that would restore voting rights to criminals who have completed their prison sentences. 

"The legislators we elect this November will decide whether the proposed amendments are advanced or stopped," the state conference said. 

Democratic candidate supports abortion, assisted suicide, opposes conscience protections

Competing in the state gubernatorial race this year are current Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears and former U.S. Rep. Abigail Spanberger, D-Virginia. 

In a candidate comparison handout, the state bishops noted that Spanberger has voiced support for assisted suicide, while Earle-Sears has argued against it, stating: "We don't want to be in the business of death." 

Earle-Sears, meanwhile, has expressed support for legal conscience protections for health care professionals and other religious objectors, while Spanberger has explicitly said she opposes allowing religious institutions to opt out of medical procedures with which they disagree. 

The bishops further highlighted the state races for lieutenant governor and attorney general. Former State Del. Jay Jones, a Democrat who is running for attorney general, has voiced support for abortion and for now-repealed state rules that allowed teachers to hide a child's chosen "gender identity" from his or her parents. Current Attorney General Jason Miyares has spoken out against such rules. 

In a separate handout, the state Catholic conference emphasized the "four principles of Catholic social teaching" articulated by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, including "the dignity of the human person" and "the common good."

Protecting human dignity, the bishops said, includes opposing abortion, euthanasia, and human cloning as well as "overcoming poverty, ending use of the death penalty, and opposing racism, torture, unjust war," and other injustices. 

"With so much at stake, we must prepare to engage in this year's critical voting decisions — through conscience formation, prayer, and fasting," Burbidge and Knestout wrote. 

"United in the Eucharist, let us pray for one another and join together as active participants in promoting the common good."

Full Article